Ion Crăciunescu’s verdict in the case of possible FCSB sanctions



[ad_1]

  • La Liga: Valencia – Seville, Tuesday, 18:30, Digi Sport 1

  • League 1: CFR Cluj – University of Craiova, Tuesday, 21:00, Digi Sport 1

The ‘rojiblancos’ were the first to request a penalty, in the 41st minute, after Octavian Popescu fell in the area when he was knocked down by Gabriel Vașvari, a phase in which the central Horațiu Feșnic allowed the game to continue.

FCSB had to receive a penalty in the match with Sepsi

However, replays showed that Gabriel Vașvari did not hit the ball in the 41st minute, but Octavian Popescu’s foot.

After the match, present at the Digi Sport Special studio, Ion Crăciunescu gave the verdict: “In my opinion, it was a penalty for FCSB”.

VIDEO with the duel between Gabriel Vașvari and Octavian Popescu:

In the second half of the game, it was Sepsi’s turn to call for a penalty, after a 75-minute duel between Olimpiu Moruțan and Adnan Aganovic. Covasna coach Leo Grozavu protested vehemently both during the match and at the end-of-match statements, but Ion Crăciunescu relayed that Horațiu Feșnic acted correctly when he decided not to show the point with lime.

A player can come between the opponent and the ball. The regulation says that you can interpose if you are at a distance from the ball, no one has specified what the exact distance from the ball is, but, in general, it is a distance of two meters.

From my point of view, if Morutan has the foreground, it is his right. I didn’t see him disturb his opponent. From my point of view it’s not a shame“Ion Crăciunescu transmitted.

VIDEO with the phase in which Sepsi requested a penalty in the match with FCSB:

Tags: ion craciunescu , horatiu fesnic , fcsb sepsi , fcsb arbitration – sepsis , penalty fcsb – sepsi

[ad_2]