[ad_1]
Radu Chiriță wrote a text on his personal blog, titled “Done! Enough! Enough! “, Which is directly related to the sentence of the lawyer Robert Roșu, to five years in prison with execution, decision pronounced by a panel of judges, about which the law professor writes that it is the” black panel “of the Superior Court of Cassation and Justice. , in the now famous archive “Granja Băneasa”.
The text written by Professor Chiriță is a complete X-ray of all Romanian justice, with judges, prosecutors and lawyers, together. The lawyer talks about an execution in the Robert Roșu case (photo) and how DNA Brașov prosecutors forced proof in this case. Radu Chiriță was the defense attorney in this case and he knows very well what he says and writes, because he had direct access to the file.
Referring to lawyer Robert Roșu, Professor Chiriță calls him “friend” and says that he never thought that he would not be acquitted on appeal, after having been acquitted on the merits, in the Brașov Court of Appeal.
“I don’t know how he had the strength to tell the children that he was going to jail, although he did nothing. Since then, I can’t help but think about the dozens of discussions in which I told him that although he is judged by a panel with history, no one can condemn him. That you have no reason to motivate a conviction, not even the worst judgment in bad faith. That would be absolutely absurd. That he already has an ICCJ decision (since his arrest) in which he writes that he did nothing but do his job. And so I sincerely did not fear his conviction, he was convinced that the acquittal will stand, ”writes Professor Chiriță.
The story in a nutshell
The lawyer Chiriță briefly presented the whole story, where the archive investigated by DNA Brașov was born, but also how this archive was built.
“Paul is the illegitimate nephew of Charles II. After Carol’s death, Paul obtains a judicial decision in Portugal in the 1950s that recognizes the quality of successor to the former king of Romania. After the restitution laws appear, the man he begins to agitate to obtain the assets that had been nationalized on his own, from his mother and other relatives. Being…, he gets into all kinds of combinations, with all kinds of lawyers he has no money to pay and promises them parts of the assets recovered ”.
At one point, Paul de România got in touch with Remus Truică, a convicted person in the case, and Israeli citizen Benny Steinmetz, with whom he agrees to sell his disputed rights to the claimed properties.
Here, lawyer Robert Roșu, then 29, appears in the scheme. The Israelis put the condition on Prince Paul to use the services of a serious law firm, in Țucă, Zbârcea and associations, where the lawyer Robert Roșu worked and where he was given the task of dealing with the case and making a report with everything. that can be obtained judicially, from the fortune requested by Prince Paul.
Băneasa Farm
One of the prince’s disputes concerns Băneasa Farm, the former royal farm. The Red Lawyer accompanied Prince Paul of Romania to various meetings.
“On the date that the Institute’s management analyzes the destination of that request, Robert appears with Paul at the meeting and supports the request. He explains to them the reasons why the request for restitution would be legal and gives them answers to legal doubts. people have had. He also gives them a folder with legal analysis and annexes. It was convincing, because after a while the Institute ordered the restitution. Pablo passes his part of the building to the Israelis. Robert also goes to the notary this time to sign the documents, “writes Chiriță.
How the DNA Brașov archive was built
At one point, Prince Paul was not satisfied with the work of his lawyers, says Radu Chiriță, and even resigned from the services of lawyer Roșu, because the amount he received from this settlement was too small, and he began to write complaints. criminal. One of these complaints reached DNA Brașov.
“Because the complaint related only to the Snagov forest and the Băneasa farm, it ignored the other buildings. They are a bit confused (by DNA Brașov – nn) that they were court decisions in the Snagov forest case, as well as the fact that they couldn’t figure out why the heck it wasn’t legal to return the Băneasa farm. It also confuses them that Paul was complaining that the Israelis actually gave him too little money, not that the restitution was illegal. But an elite unit knows how to get out of trouble.
Call the judges who pronounced those decisions and ask the prosecutor things like: why did he give it, why is he not motivated like the world, if it is legal, etc. The judges say that, in fact, now that it looks better, the decision is not very legal … These judges were later asked in court why they changed their mind, and one was honest: “Because I am also a man and I have a life, “that’s why I said that to DNA. He cannot be charged, he would not have been the first county charged with abuse because he made a decision and no one defended his predecessors except his lawyers. With this, the prosecutor solves his first problem: the execution of the decision is an abuse, because the decision is not legal. The judges who gave it said so, so we have evidence, “writes Chiriță.
Report of “civil” experts
The second problem is that DNA Brașov did not know how to remove Prince Paul from the equation of the succession of King Charles II. To do this, the famous “civil” employees of DNA Brașov write a report, which Professor Chiriță dismisses.
“To reach this conclusion, they used the fact that the judicial decision in Portugal recognizing this quality was recognized in Romania after Paul had made the request for restitution. They ignored that the exequator procedure obviously produces retroactive effects, that he was the Carol’s successor as he was born not only in 2011 when the ICCJ issued the recognition decision, etc. However, later in the indictment, they wrote about 20 pages about how Paul is not Carol’s successor, dusting off the ICCJ decision that it said otherwise. “
The third question for the DNA prosecutors arose from the question of how to shut Prince Paul’s mouth. And this was solved quite simply. He was charged.
“It was discovered that no nails were removed – and fraud, blackmail, etc. were shelved – on the contrary, the Romanian state was stabbed and criminal investigation started for all kinds,” Professor Chiriță also wrote.
Black Superior Court Suit
After the acquittal in Brașov, DNA appealed to the High Court of Cassation and Justice. The law professor says that the entire file was sent to DNA so that prosecutors could explain the reasons for the appeal. He then registered with the ICCJ on December 24, when the gendarme and “Santa Claus” were at headquarters.
“I write on appeal that it is true that Robert did his job as an attorney, but the mere presence with a client and the provision of legal assistance and representation are sufficient to become complicit in his actions. Since I read that sentence a year ago, I can’t get it out of my mind, “writes Chiri Chă as well.
Finally, the lawyer concludes, the accusations made against Red’s lawyer could only lead to his acquittal. But it was not like that.
“The case is randomly distributed to a court panel, at the hearing of which any lawyer who knows where Batiştei Street is (the seat of the High Court of Cassation and Justice turns black. Someday, there will also have to be a discussion here. Why the hell are the decisions of some panels, this and others, constantly questioned and other panels almost never? ”Asks Chiriță rhetorically.
About this court panel, Radu Chiriță says that it is the “black panel”.
