[ad_1]
The former great footballer believes that the change was caused by possible medical problems in Istrate. The rojiblancos striker stood out in the 38 minutes that were assigned to him and he passed the goal twice, which was also warned by Balint.
Gabi Balint: “Istrate played very well in the game”
“I suspect that Istrate had a health problem since they changed him. I cannot conceive how you have an extra player on the field, you put a player to give you a bonus in attack and then you change him to put a defensive medium, to strengthen means, medium? You have to be a coach in the dwarfs, in “Pike hedgehogs”.
You cannot do this, especially since he is an 18-year-old player, who entered very well, you could see that FCSB is different with a top and Tănase further back. If not, tear up his coach card, “Balint said on the” Fotbal Club “show on DigiSport.
Ilie Dumitrescu, present in the study, has a different opinion. He considers that behind the change were tactical considerations, Petrea wanting to maintain the advantage in the final minutes by introducing Perianu’s “blocking”.
However, Balint did not accept the version: Elijah explained beautifully, as Petrea explains many times. This is how a specialist sees it ”.
+27 PHOTOSLeague 1: FCSB is leader
More news about UTA – FCSB:
Andra, upset at the top by a young man. The obsessive detail that infuriated the artist: “Shut up!”
Liberty
