Grounds for the sentence for which Elena Udrea was sentenced: “She had the pleasure of condemning me” | VIDEO



[ad_1]

The document containing the motivation for the conviction of Elena Udrea and Ioana Băsescu was analyzed by investigative journalist Adina Anghelescu and commented on by Elena Udrea on Antena 3.

The motivation is absolutely spectacular, it’s about recordings of discussions, it’s about a whole team. We found out practically who the witnesses and all the accusers were, and in this way we also find out what the court relied on when it handed down those sentences.

The court determines that during the presidential elections of 2009 they took place, that one of the candidates was Traian Băsescu and that at the same time as the presidential elections there was a referendum and the whole situation is based on the funding of campaign materials for the referendum.

Adina Anchelescu: “Motivation includes certain questions that can be questioned”

“In my opinion, the file consists of many statements from witnesses and complainants. Many of them, if not the majority, who were close to Mrs. Udrea joined her, so it is said in the motivation, that there was the campaign team coordinated by Elena Udrea, who had her headquarters in Lipscani street. (…)

All these complainants, including a very important one, rather collaborator, is Ioana Băsescu’s ex-boyfriend, Francesco Giovanni, who had received a suspended sentence in 2018 for tax evasion, became a DNA collaborator. There are spicy places in some places, very funny topics for us, but for the evidence on Ioana Băsescu it’s not funny at all because she had a vibe about him. At one point, Ioana Băsescu even says in the discussions between the two, she says “take off your shirt. I want to see if you have the vibe in you or not”.

Following the things that the judge tries to motivate as clearly as possible, that Elena Udrea was the head of all these transaction intermediaries through certain fictitious contracts, in the sense that the services for the campaign were not performed, that it was written in those contracts. .

There are also those nuances that Mrs. Udrea’s lawyer explained and that will be appealed or motivated in the appeal of this sentence, of eight years received by Elena Udrea and five years received by Ioana Băsescu, namely, the issue related to the laundering of active, that is, where the judge somehow motivates very interesting and I would question.

Adina Anghelescu: “It’s something very strange”

It says that money laundering for the crime of bribery, even if there is no prior conviction or the fact by which the goods were produced or the perpetrator of the crime is not precisely determined, it does not come from the crime and then it was laundered. a matter that I had never known before for such reasons, in addition, in the prosecution, the respective acts of money laundering that led to the acceptance of bribes are in fact in 2012 and 2013. There are issues that can be put under the question mark “Adina Anghelescu said.

Elena Udrea: “The judge does not explain how she convicted me of four events that were not provided for by law in 2009”

“What happens between the recordings between Ioana Băsescu and Giovani, put there by the judge, above all to attract the attention of the press and distract attention from the essential? The judge comes and invokes a European convention and some agreements, a Greek report, how can you come up with such enormity and convict someone, not on the basis of criminal law, not on the basis of the criminal code in force at the time, but on the basis of certain conventions and subsequent reports and documents How to say that I laundered money from 2009 from criminal acts from 2010-2012?

Udrea: “Perhaps he was pleased to convict me. I will file a criminal complaint with him”

“The accusations are absurd. He found himself in a situation in which he gave a decision, gave convictions and had to find reasons to cover up the scandal of those who read and know the law and realized how enormous this motivation is. With these songs between Ioana “. Băsescu and Giovani and delight the readers.

That is not the motivation. The motivation is about an unimaginable abuse that Jderu committed, for which I will file a criminal complaint and a complaint with the SCM, ”said Elena Udrea.

Do you have images or information that could become news? Send us a message at 0744.882.200 on Whatsapp or Signal



[ad_2]