[ad_1]
In a post on Instagram, Madalina Ghenea says that, although she is unaware of the legal field, she understands “to collect public information issued by state institutions and reputed professional bodies that it is possible that a man (lawyer Robert Rosu) has been an abuse and that abuse can be a dangerous precedent, which would affect the rights of all of us. “
“In summary, I understand that the lawyer Robert Rosu, practicing his profession, was accused by DNA of violating the law, the Court of Appeals of Brasov acquitted him, and on appeal the Superior Court of Cassation and Justice, based on the same accusations, returned He acquitted him in 180 degrees and sentenced him to 5 years in prison.
The accusations would be that by drafting a contract he would have organized a criminal group and by presenting some legal documents (including final and irrevocable decisions issued by the courts), claiming the client’s case before a commission would have been an accessory to abuse of office.
Two things concern me. If you were convicted of these charges alone, I can only say that what this attorney did any other attorney would have done. Represent your clients. Why, on the one hand, was he acquitted and, on the other, convicted on the same charges? Did Romanian justice go wrong somewhere? “Wrote the model, who considers that” it is mandatory “that the reason for the sentence in the case of Robert Rosu be drawn up in 30 days.
The reactions of the fans did not wait. While some were correct in stating that “Romania ceased to be a rule of law in 1989” or that “in recent years, judicial decisions are made for political reasons in Romania”, many of the fans blamed Madalina. He was ashamed because he was intervening in a field he did not know
“Madalina, my darling, my beautiful one, my love … I love you to death, but … please … do not talk about what you do not know or do not understand … honestly, it seems that you have not written. .. please, I beg of you, stay away from this mess (including Mircea Badea) … PS. I hope you are not friends with Dana Budeanu, it would be too much even for me … I love you sincerely “, wrote one of the fans.
“I saw you a while ago a post about that f ***** by Mircea Badea, I asked you what was wrong with her, you didn’t say anything, I also went over it,” I forgave you “But this post shows me that I’m wrong, I should have unfollowed you since then! Have a happy life! “is another message.
“If you were silent … at least you are beautiful,” wrote another Romanian fan to the model. “Let the law do justice, don’t go where your pot doesn’t boil to the nines. If you used the beds of some celebrities it doesn’t mean you are a judge in the supreme court. That lawyer did much more than represent his clients and was involved in the actual fraud ”is another message left on the model’s Instagram page.
Read also:
Supreme Court: The “Ferma Baneasa” case was correctly distributed to the court panel that rendered the final judgment
[ad_2]
