[ad_1]
On November 18, the second term of the trial took place in which Gheorghe Dincă is tried for the murder of Alexandra Măceşanu and Luiza Melencu. The hearing took place in the Court of Olt.
The lawyer Carmen Obârșanu made shocking revelations and harsh accusations about the case and the case, exclusively for DC NEWS.
Dincă’s lawyer did not read the file and did not speak to Dincă! “Yes, what the hell are you writing there?”
“Dincă’s lawyer didn’t even read the file and didn’t even speak to Dincă! I don’t know why he didn’t want to read the file and why he didn’t want to talk to Dinca. One week I prayed for his lawyer: “Go sir, and read the file, go and talk to him!” No and no, and no, and no! Well, Dinca also knew that his lawyer had not read the file! How did you know that? I ask myself this question: Who told Dincă this ?! The lawyer had some children in the file, he told me, he had some statements from Dincă.
But Dincă’s statements are not taken procedurally and do not contain real stuff. I don’t know who teaches Dinca, because they process it all the time. Someone is teaching you! Someone tells you what to do and what to say the next day. So it was when he was arrested, so it was in Bucharest. He did not even write the statements in the room. Neither did the records that they filed in the file, during the period he was under surveillance, nowhere, no one in the room asked him what he was writing, but he was writing a lot of statements.
Nobody asked him: yes, what the hell are you writing there? So where did he write and under whose influence? That He once said that they made him write several times and that if he made a mistake, he would start over., in those statements in which he said what he did to the girls, but there is no evidence in that house that it was rape! That’s the thing!“, said Carmen Obârșanu, for DC NEWS.
All the evidence FALSE. “They were so stupid, like Ciomu!”
“I can’t figure out if it’s a measure made to dismantle a supply chain or … I don’t know, you can’t figure out what’s there, because All evidence is falsified! Look!
For example, something obvious, at 14 Luiza disappears, at 15 in the morning, a man calls Luiza’s grandfather and tells him that the girl has left the country. Grandpa calls the police and gives the policeman the phone number. The policeman calls from his number, from his work phone, to that one. The phone rings, he doesn’t answer, after which the policeman sends a message: Dioști Police are looking for you!
After that, she calls him back, so it’s about 2 calls and a message. Well, when the developer is removed from that phone, it is found that only one message was sent from that phone. Just the message! Calls no longer appear! Who deleted the calls? Because the policeman told me a week ago: Ma’am, the phone rang, but no one answered, and then I sent the message. Why were the calls dropped? What other calls were there and were they deleted? And also from Luiza’s phone, there are many deleted calls, many, and from Dincă’s phone, the one with the subscription is deleted a lot and you can’t give a forecast, say something, if you don’t have the correct evidence! Where are the originals? And the old man (not Luiza’s grandfather) says very well: Give me the originals! You have no right!
These were so stupid that they cut as in the case of Ciomu. They cut one side, they cut the other and the cuts don’t match. There are some phone numbers on Dincă’s phone, in the listing (no listing, developer), that is, operator income, there are other phone numbers, and for a month and a half there are at least 13 different phone numbers, numbers in more on Dincă’s phone, compared to the list. Well, why do the numbers, the calls appear on your phone, but not in the list? Why? “Added the lawyer.
“I can’t think of the figure of the chief prosecutor”
“I can’t think of the figure of the chief prosecutor when Luiza’s mother asked her: ‘Ma’am, are the girls dead?’
– “Yes Yes!” she said. And he looked Luiza’s mother in the eye as if he wanted to convey to her: “They are dead! You are looking for them in vain!”
Well, if you know that I’m dead, where are the bodies, that I’m not in the barrel and in the bag? There is a young man involved, who knew the technical part, and at night, when the prosecutors were at the door, Samples were planted, no samples were removed! They were not erased, they were planted! That’s why they didn’t even go in! They knew that he could no longer find Alexandra there, she was long gone and she left standing there.. We all noticed! And the dog exposed it. The CD with Alexandra’s scream is not in the archive! Nowhere!”, Revealed the lawyer for the Melencu family.
“If anyone finds this, I’ll eat it!”
“Why is Cumpănașu silent? Why is he stupid now? Every time I asked him to participate and help me, he rejected me. I have messages sent by him! Look up these phone numbers, so you can move forward a bit in the archive. Excuse me, I’m busy, I have some problems and 2 hours later he appeared on the cherry and I asked him: “Are you healthy? Neither he nor his lawyer read the file. “! If someone finds, from January 15 until a week ago, a request signed by the defender of the Măce familiaanu family to study the file, I will eat it! So there is no other request than that of the release of some records, which was rejected by the judge. They didn’t even issue a copy of Alexandra’s death certificate. He refused to answer and I asked Alexandra’s mother if she did and she said no. I don’t understand what’s behind the business, I don’t understand! The children were not even removed from the archive. So I don’t understand what’s going on there, who, why? Every time I go, everyone looks, nobody says anything! ” She told us.
December 16, INTERESTING in the process. What if 2 years have passed since the case started?
Now, on December 16, it will be very interesting, because if Dincă refuses to give statements again, under another pretext, I will have to insist on going to the tests, because 2 years are approaching and we will not get more. The telephone agents do not keep evidence for more than two years, but the truth is that the evidence is with the prosecutor somewhere, because it would not be so silly if the prosecutors did not deal with that evidence. but they have them elsewhere, ”concluded Carmen Obârșanu.
The problems of the Caracal case have been confirmed exclusively for DC NEWS, and by lawyer Tonel Pop who said firmly that: “Both the trial and the case are ice on the shore. Nothing has been advanced, nothing has happened!”
[ad_2]
