[ad_1]
Mihai Gâdea and Dan Andronic tried last night to explain the true interest of the latest scandal that is about to break out before the parliamentary elections. An attack on Patriarch Daniel, described by the press as fake news, or a failed attack, as Mihai Gâdea called it last night on Antena 3.
Following Patriarch Daniel’s unexpected statement a few days ago, a publication – “Newsweek” from Romania, run by a journalist who has proven to be a falsifier of his own university studies, Sabin Orcan, attacks him vilely. With the help of a CNSAS official, Mădălin Hodor. Which threatens the Patriarch with the possibility of publishing the Security file.
What did the Patriarch say that infuriated them so much?
“In the fall of 1989, on the occasion of the feast of Saint Demetrius the New, on October 27, the communist authorities prohibited the worship of the holy relics. (…) This humiliation of the pious Saint Demetrius the New was rewarded in the sense that in a few months the communist regime fell. (…) God is not fooled! He is patient for a long time, but he is also fair. “said Patriarch Daniel in his address Tuesday at the feast of Saint Pious Dimitrie the New, Protector of Bucharest, at the Summer Altar near the Patriarchal Cathedral.
“It was strong, a message like it wasn’t and how it should be at that time. And millions of people in their souls were glad that someone, and not all, spoke on their behalf. But what happened today. His execution began today“Said Mihai Gâdea.
Last night on Antena 3, Mihai Gâdea defended Patriarch Daniel, revealing the true bet of the scandal:
“Who and what is the Patriarch talking about? On the fact that that communist regime fell short after making fun of what faith, worship, Church means. How were the communists? If you spoke up, if you had the slightest objection to what they were doing, they would shoot you for not seeing you and not just for a style form. They were shooting at you. The communists… Well, if that’s what the communists did, today how to proceed: he spoke yesterday, today we threaten to contaminate him. We’re messing it up today. It is a failed attempt against the Patriarch, in my opinion, but the attempt, the operation in this cinema must be seen by you. In my opinion, after these operations, those who do such lynchings will not be loved more and I believe that the Patriarch will be loved more.
Mihai Gâdea continued: In an “extraordinary” post, of course, Newsweek from Romania, not real Newsweek, but from Romania, the following issue appears. It is possible that Patriarch Daniel’s security record was not burned in December 1989. 24 hours after Patriarch Daniel did what a Church leader does. Speak up, defend what you have to defend. So what is the information? Who has a file, who can have a file, who did something reprehensible? It takes a very old story and throws it out into the public space, although there has never been any proof. Precisely to show that whoever speaks, we take care of him … “
Live with Mihai Gâdea, EvZ journalist Dan Andronic explained what this alleged reveal looks like, a detailed look at EvZ as well:
“It is one more stage in a hybrid war of the neo-Marxists against the Church. A war whose political interest I understand, but which has entered the realm of misery, of personal attacks. It is a reissue of the scandal that tried to block the election of the historian Ioan-Aurel Pop to the head of the Romanian Academy by publishing a document in which he, along with Ion Cristoiu, Zoe Petre and others, was accused of collaborating with the Securitate. As I tested, it was a manipulation of the lowest order. It was a document presented truncated by Mădălin Hodor himself, in the company of Sabin Orcan himself. A doctored document missing a deliberately hidden page that masked the name of another historian, Lucian Boia. It is further proof of the miserable way in which the archives of the ancient Securitate are used in political battle. We can say that the CNSAS failed in its mission to clean up history before 1989 and became a blackmail tool, through pressure from a group of neo-Marxist sympathies, who use the archives as they are interested in at the moment and their colleagues ” .
Mugur Ciuvică added: “I agree with you, but it must be said that this group that you are talking about worked very well during the time of Traian Băsescu, now taken over by USR. That only the former head of the Research and Documentation Department, Geanina Nagâț, faithful to Traian Băsescu until some time ago, was proposed by USR at CNSAS College… ”
Dan Andronic concluded: “A clarification: I believe that this group of CNSAS was taken from General Florian Coldea, not from Traian Băsescu …”
