[ad_1]
“I had a little more extensive comment on the Swedish model, I described what happened there and the Swedish model is not a decision. It is a process. Because I don’t think that any country can ever apply such a model in the other.
In Sweden, in early spring, in the absence of restrictions, there were a significant number of cases with quite high mortality, especially in vulnerable groups, but then due to a very good communication and education strategy, people understood that the control this pandemic depends on them, in their country of course, and the normality of public and economic life also depends.
This is the Swedish model. However, to arrive at this model, we need a construction. What should come out now and even if restrictive measures are taken in the next period, we should be able to build public trust in decision makers.
It seems to me that we are wasting our time with all kinds of sterile debates: who is to blame, who was responsible.
And we do not realize that we are talking about a public health problem that not only affects NLP, USR or PSD, and the solution must come from the political class that must understand that it must help. together to solve this public health problem.
Or, the trust of citizens will be generated by the behavior of the political class. You see, I’ve been in politics for a week and I’ve had seizures from day one.
I see these things happening. Today I am not the target, but there are other people on the political scene who are accused of all kinds of things.
We are wasting time, the pandemic is advancing and the danger increases a lot and I think it would be wise to end these sterile disputes and find together a strategy to convince the population that they should be part of this project “, said Prof. Dr. Alexandru Rafila in the Synthesis of the day.
[ad_2]
