[ad_1]
“Today I learned from the press that DNA sent me to court in a case in which I was accused of an act of which I am not guilty. I received the news while completing my candidate file for an eligible seat in the Romanian Parliament. I was, am and will be a just and worthy man, regardless of the circumstances. And I won’t accept hurting those around me or going out with my head down! I am resigning from the Social Democratic Party, ”Decebal Făgădău recently posted on Facebook.
He would run for the second position of the Chamber of Deputies in the PSD Constanța lists in the parliamentary elections, after losing the position of mayor in the local elections on September 27. Decebal Făgădău considers, ironically, that sending him to court on the day he was due to present his candidacy is “a coincidence”. He declined to comment further.
The case in which DNA sends him to court is the one in which Radu Mazăre was indicted in December 2017, along with the former deputy mayor, Decebal Făgădău, and four former directors of the Constanța City Council. According to DNA, on Mamaia beach, in the central area of the resort, a 6-story hotel was illegally built, based on a building permit issued in 2009. That same year, the mayor, Radu Mazare, and the construction company were sued by a businessman who owns a hotel in the vicinity of the building in question, requesting the cancellation of the building license.
On Wednesday, ADN sent to trial the mayor, still in office, Decebal Făgădău, on the date of the deed of Deputy Mayor of Constanța, Radu Mazăre, on the date of the deed of mayor of the municipality, and Nicolaeta Constantin, Elena Luiza Tănase , Mariana Munteanu, former heads of the mayor’s office, as well as Fulvia Dinescu, current interim secretary of the Municipal City Council, who at the time of writing was deputy executive director of the local public administration department of the mayor’s office, along with two other people. Upon being sent to court, Fulvia Dinescu must be suspended from office, in accordance with the law.
According to DNA, the six defendants, officials of the Constanza City Council, during 2013 allegedly illegally reauthorized the construction of a luxury building already 95% high on Mamaia beach, for which previously, the construction permit had been definitively and irrevocably annulled by the civil court. It is a block of flats built on Mamaia beach, owned by a powerful local businessman, who came into conflict with a tourist investor whose hotel was in the shadow of the illegally constructed building on the beach.
By final civil judgment handed down by the Constanţa Court of Appeal in 2012, the building license issued by the Constanţa City Council was revoked. Later, during the same year, the Constanţa City Council came with a supplement by which it notified the court of its intervention. a new element, namely that on September 3, 2013 a new building permit was issued for the building whose demolition is required. Therefore, the Municipality of Constan Ayuntamientoa considered that there was no longer a legal basis for the plaintiff company to request and obtain the demolition of the building constructed under GF + 5F-6F.
The same issues, based on the existence of a valid authorization dated September 3, 2013, were invoked in defense by the construction company. In 2016, through civil judgment n. 745/2016, the Constanta Court ordered the cancellation of the building permit issued on September 3, 2013 by the Constanta City Council, as a building was already constructed on the land for which the permit was issued (the residential building which had been built at a 95% ratio based on the canceled authorization) so the 2013 authorization was illegally issued.
Later, the decision was annulled because the parties reached an amicable agreement. The case was sent to trial in the Constanța Court.
