[ad_1]
Moldovan Nouă Mayor Adrian Torma, whose re-election was annulled by the BEC, says this is “just a culmination of the attacks against me, because from the beginning of the campaign they tried to exclude me from the former colleagues of the PNL.” . It says that the lack of signatures from the local leaders who formed the PSD-Pro Romania alliance for the City Council is a matter of form and not substance, and that the court’s decision was later corrected.
“Moldavia Nouă is just the culmination of the attacks against me against this BEC decision, because from the beginning of the campaign, my former colleagues from the NLP tried to exclude me, as I was no longer part of their team.
It is a shock, not only for me, it is for democracy from my point of view, because the right to be elected and to choose is a constitutional right that worked in Romania after the Revolution.
Now, in Moldova Nouă we are experiencing a premiere. We are preparing an appeal to the competent courts, but we hope to have short deadlines, because, from what we have learned, the BEC quickly decided to re-hold the elections on October 11, two weeks after those of September 27.
The BEC issued another decision in the 1990s, declining its powers in the case of Moldova Nouă.
We hope that justice and democracy in Romania will work and those who recently screamed thieves will now have the wisdom that a man elected by half the citizens has the right to lead the community, ”said the mayor of Moldova Nouă, on Digi24.
He explained how the additional ballots ended up at the polls.
“It’s about two ballots and the difference between us was 106 votes. The two votes they are talking about were mixed with two more or less extra votes.
They did not make that complaint at the electoral college. So there is no complaint. This fraud is not verified by the police, it is not an open criminal case for electoral fraud.
I don’t realize how BEC realized what the district office didn’t realize, the county office didn’t realize. Suddenly in BEC only in some documents, which cannot be proven, because we do not have a document behind that says something that they have been defrauded.
Errors of one vote, two exist in almost any section of Romania. For this reason there is the notion of a rectifying decision, because it can be wrong. Both in BE of Moldavia Nouă and in many polling stations in electoral districts there were such errors, which did not influence the decision. We have an example from Botoșani, a city where he won by 33 votes and the elections were not resumed.
Here is a duel, being a former mayor of the PNL, excluded from the party by the current Minister of the Interior. It’s just a matter of your pride and pride in me, but sadly we are violating democracy.
To get an idea of why I was challenged at the beginning of the election campaign for the right to run, it is a question of form. The fact that the signatures of the presidents of local organizations were needed on two documents, that is, myself and the president of Pro Romania, who were in the presentation of the file in the constituency, are not matters of substance. The basic thing is to be over 23 years old, not have legal interdiction and live in that locality.
In Câmpia Turzii, the name of the locality was wrong, Turda wrote from USR, if I am not mistaken, and it was considered an error of form, not of substance. We have met all the funds to be able to execute.
An appeal was made to the court. The court treated these errors as substantive issues, we complied, being timely, those errors with signature, a new decision of the Electoral Bureau of the Constituency validated by the AEP, by the INS was issued by our passage on the ballots. BE is not the fault of the constituency of Moldova Nouă, because they do not vote.
We will have a mayor in Moldova Nouă who will not be elected by the citizens and will probably not be elected, nor will he be liked by the community, ”said Torma.
Editing: Alexandru Costea
