[ad_1]
Tudor Chirilă sent a message on Sunday before the start of the school year.
„Yesterday I spoke with a 12 year old girl about starting school. She is a student at a school in Sector 1. I asked her how she would like to start. Online, she replied. – Why? – Because I’m not that stressed when it’s online. – What stresses you out at school? “Well when the teacher yells or takes me to the blackboard or the lightning tests.” “What could go wrong when they bring you to the board?” – Well, if you don’t know the exercise, the children laugh at you. – Well, the teacher doesn’t intervene, he leaves them like that, doesn’t he tell them that they could be in the same situation? – Sometimes yes sometimes no.
– Does the teacher have favorite students? – Oh yeah. – Well, even according to the criteria you choose, how do you know that some of them are favored? – I don’t know, for example we have a classmate who hugs the teacher every hour, which makes the teacher more attached to her. – She hugs him, is she going to him? – Yes, after class – So, on your own initiative? – Yes, and it gives you easier exercises, better grades – Do you think so? You’re convinced. Doesn’t it give you all the same exercises, homework? – Yes, but when he brings us to the board, no.
– I mean, do you think she conquered him, I mean, if she hugs him, he feels more noticed … – Yes, I’m a friend of that colleague and he tells me that’s why he hugs the teachers – And all this disappears in line, is that what you say? In fact, you say that there is more equality in online school. But are online teachers better? – Some do it better than others, yes …
This dialogue says nothing new: the practices and environment in schools are not conducive to learning. Learning is seen as a chore, a series of stressful events that only inhibit any desire to learn, think, dialogue, “wrote Tudor Chirilă on Sunday on his Facebook account.
“The authoritarian relationship with the students, however, is interrupted by various practices that try to fantasize or tame. We know all this about the system. We also know that no politician in Romania wants to change this system because everyone benefits, except the children. Now, on the well-known disaster in education came the Pandemic, which exposed, in all its splendor, the incompetence of a ministry of education led by “specialists” who were unable in three months of vacation to devise coherent scenarios to return to a safe school. Furthermore, under the pretext of autonomy that they have never invoked, implemented, encouraged before, they passed on the responsibility of opening the school year in the schoolyard. But because for years the directors of the schools and the provinces were in a subordinate relationship similar to the damaging one between the student and the teacher, here the responsibility of the schools in the problem of retaking the courses did not yield any results.
I don’t know where else he can get out of the situation he got himself into.
A general mockery of children who in the public system should be the only beneficiaries of the educational act. We must not be under any illusions, Monica Cristina Anisie will not resign. It would be of no use because she would not have anyone to appoint in her place, competition is not one of the criteria“Specified Tudor Chirilă.
“I still believe, I hope, that there will come a time when someone will wake up and understand that the only solution for a real reform is the depoliticization of education and the agreement of all the parties for this step. That at least one field in this country can free itself from politics, theft and inefficiency ”, transmitted Tudor Chirilă.
[ad_2]
