Three of the most widespread conspiracy theories related to the coronavirus. Analysis by the Washington Post



[ad_1]

With the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, numerous conspiracy theories began to circulate about the origin of the new type of virus.

Image of the article Three of the most widespread conspiracy theories related to the coronavirus. Analysis by the Washington Post

Three of the most widespread conspiracy theories related to the coronavirus. Analysis by the Washington Post

The vast majority of these conspiracy theories focus on the Wuhan lab, which is believed to have accidentally or deliberately “escaped” from the new coronavirus.

publication The Washington Post analyzed three of the most common circulation theories. According to American journalists, one of these theories is certainly false, plausible, but without clear evidence, and a third contains much of the truth.

The first theory: Biological weapons research has led to the outbreak of the pandemic.

A former Israeli officer said in January that “the new coronavirus could come from a laboratory connected to China’s biological weapons program.” The laboratory he was referring to was in Wuhan, and the ex-officer’s statement was published in the Washington Post. The article suggested that the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory and the Wuhan Institute of Virology would be involved in the production of biological weapons. The only truth in this theory is that the two institutions really exist, but so far no evidence has been found that they are involved in the creation of biological weapons.

The second theory: the coronavirus “escaped” from a laboratory.

A month after the appearance of the first theory, that is, in February, a new version appeared, more “sweetened” for the general public and with greater possibilities of capture. The new coronavirus is said to be of natural origin, so it was not created in the laboratory in a biological weapons program, but was accidentally dropped from a laboratory.

Which lab Obviously everyone in Wuhan. The new theory understood so well that even some American politicians adopted it. “We don’t know the source of the virus, and we have to find out,” Tom Cotton, a Republican senator from Arkansas and a military veteran, told FoxNews in February. There were also scientists who did not completely rule out such a variant. However, even in this case, there is no conclusive evidence that the new coronavirus has been studied in the Wuhan laboratory or has accidentally “escaped” from there.

The third theory: the Chinese government concealed information and misled

What is true in this case is that, in fact, Beijing officials sent data on what would become a pandemic. An investigation by the Associated Press revealed that Chinese officials withheld information, including from the World Health Organization, for six days. During this period, the virus spread, and according to the data, 3,000 people were infected.

And an investigation by Chinese journalists showed that the government did not report the actual death toll in Wuhan. Under these conditions, it is difficult to say and predict how the entire situation would have evolved on a global scale if Chinese officials had been informed in time.

Journalists at the Washington Post conclude by saying that it is understandable why people tend to believe such theories and look for culprits and scapegoats for the situation, but a series of small mistakes is far more plausible than a large-scale conspiracy.

photo source: profimedia

For the most important news of the day, broadcast in real time and presented equidistant, LIKE our Facebook page!


If you liked the article, follow MEDIAFAX.RO on FACEBOOK »

The content of the www.mediafax.ro website is exclusively for your personal information and use. it is Prohibited republish the content of this site in the absence of a MEDIAFAX agreement. To obtain this agreement, contact us at [email protected].



[ad_2]