[ad_1]
Hard attack launched by the journalist and publicist Ion Cristoiu against the President of Romania, after his statements about an agreement between PSD and UDMR for the autonomy of the Szekler Land. Cristoiu considers that, through the declarations on the autonomy of the Szekler Earth, President Klaus Iohannis was not only comical, but also managed to overcome in extreme nationalism the former leader of the PRM, CV Tudor, affirming that the head of state it was embarrassing.
Also read: embarrassing statistics: Eurostat announces that Romania is CHAMPION of accidents at work and DEAD employees at work
Ion Cristoiu expressed surprise at witnessing such an action by the President of Romania, especially since the Szekler Land Autonomy Law was tacitly adopted by the Chamber of Deputies, and the Senate, as the decision-making body, can reject it. .
“It was an absolutely comical moment. In the 52 years of the press that I have seen many things, I did not think I would see this moment. I never agreed with CV Tudor’s task with bubbles, who still had moments of nationalism with foam in his mouth , hysterically, because taking Transylvania overnight is an electoral hallucination. It was a tacitly approved law, it will be corrected in the Senate, there was no disgrace. This law was not the result of a public agreement and today the Hungarians come and take they put our Transylvania in a car and take it there, to Lake Balaton, “said the journalist.
Ion Cristoiu affirms that the moment of today’s departure of the head of state is absolutely unique in the history after December, his purpose is to divert the attention of the Romanians from May 15, when they await from the authorities concrete measures to relax restrictions and economic recovery.
“Let’s look at the moment, unique in post-December history. Therefore, the Romanians anxiously await what opens, how to move between locations after May 15. And suddenly we see Klaus Iohannis jumping out of bed as if he were dreaming of a parody in which he attacks Parliament on the issue of taking Transilvania in a car and acting. 1 was the disproportion between what we expected and his intervention. 2. He limited himself to that. Then it is clear that it was a parody and when he got up in the morning he repeated that performance. This is the embarrassing moment. As he says in Hungarian, when he jumps, he was very happy when he attacked Parliament. I witnessed a moment so strange that, with all my responsibility as a 72-year-old man I wonder if the president hasn’t had a drink this morning. There’s no such thing. No matter how serious the passing of the law is, it’s hard to suppose anyone would grant Szeklerland autonomy. yesterday’s attack, something is wrong. The councilors probably told him to divert attention from public opinion from May 15, from the dramatic relaxation measures with big problems, to the war with Parliament. I don’t see any connection, “said the journalist.
Ion Cristoiu stressed that Klaus Iohannis’ intervention was a shameful nationalist extremist attack, by which he compromised the very idea of Romania’s unity.
“The president jumped more spectacularly than Mircea Geoana the night he thought he had won the election.” He was really happy and he told us that while he, Orban and Violeta Alexandru y Vela, called Geacă, are fighting the pandemic, I don’t know what PSD is doing. The PSD agrees with the UDMR, what to give Transylvania? And if so, the violence of the attack, which is the violence of a nationalist extremist attack. Today I saw an embarrassing Tudor resume. CV Tudor was never embarrassing, he was sinister at a time when he was an extreme nationalist with bubbles. Klaus Iohannis was a shameful extremist nationalist. He even compromised this theme of Romanian unity because it made no sense. I do not know, it bites him in the liver that there were no early elections, that he does not have a majority, I do not know. I don’t think the Romanians didn’t think about May 15 and said, “the journalist explained.
“From a democratic point of view, it seems to me a mistake because one would say that the PSD was not careful or irresponsible or the Parliament, and another is to make this moment a moment of extremist nationalism, just about CV Tudor,” he said. added the journalist.
[ad_2]
