[ad_1]
In private notes, Tom Hagen wrote that he had told a person that he would kill him slowly but surely. He was involved in the marital conflict in 1993.
The notes are from the early 2000s to 2018 and are some of the police evidence against the billionaire accused of Lørenskog murder. Some of this material was submitted to the Nedre Romerike District Court in June.
The court later ruled again that there is a high probability that Tom Hagen was involved in the murder of Anne-Elisabeth Hagen.
He denies having anything to do with his wife’s disappearance.
Strategy, tactics and implementation
When questioned, Hagen has explained about his own notebooks where he writes detailed plans and notes on what he does. Books have been especially important to him as an entrepreneur.
VG is informed that he himself describes the books as STG books, which stand for strategy, tactics and implementation.
VG is informed that the notes include examples of thoughts of revenge, as seen by the police.
- According to information from VG, it is written about a person who was involved in the marital conflict that arose between Tom and Anne-Elisabeth Hagen in 1993. The notes state that Tom Hagen has told the person that the person in question will be killed “slowly. But surely”. These notes are from the last eight years.
- Police have found a document in which Tom Hagen has mapped several people in the couple’s circle of friends, including those above. Residence, work, and automobiles are among the recorded information.
- The person Tom Hagen wrote wanted to kill, even the police explained how the person felt threatened with death in August 1994. It happened when Tom Hagen approached the person twice; once at the office and once at home the same year.
- The 1994 report was withdrawn, but Lørenskog investigators have devoted that interest to the disappearance of Anne-Elisabeth Hagen: the person who felt threatened has been questioned in the disappearance case no later than this summer.
Police evidence that fell: Nokia tab and sleeve slot
VG has asked Tom Hagen and his advocate, attorney Svein Holden, a series of questions. In an email, the defender writes, among other things, that Tom Hagen has voluntarily sent almost 20,000 pages of private notes to the police:
– He does not recall that there should be something in the relevant documents that serves as a basis for believing that he should have had “thoughts of revenge” as alleged. If someone thinks so, then it must be due to a misunderstanding where someone tries to extract individual sentences from their context.
Read the full answer below in the case.
Hagen: I was scared in 1993
In questioning, Tom Hagen has categorically rejected revenge or jealousy as a possible motive, not even as a result of the 1993 conflict. Tom Hagen has stated that he has never been a person who takes revenge or thinks of revenge.
– The truth is so simple, affirmed in questioning.
When the billionaire invited NRK into his own living room at the end of October, he spoke warmly about his wife, describing her as very kind and stating that despite the challenges, they lived in a good marriage.
Such was the day of the disappearance: Mysterious light before the last conversation
At the same time, he confirmed that the 1993 turmoil was of such a nature that he feared it could lead to a divorce:
– So the situation was that we had been in a small valley of waves, and then the situation was that I was a little scared, Hagen said in the interview..
– What were you afraid of?
– No, it could be that, for example, if there was a divorce, then … Take it, was the answer he gave to NRK.
In 1993, the couple entered into an additional agreement to the marriage covenant. Anne-Elisabeth then gave up their common home at Sloraveien 4 as her separate property.
The sea: Tom Hagen on why the marriage covenant was changed
– Sounds weird
Hagen, who has refused to be questioned by police since June, has appeared in two NRK interviews in recent weeks. There he has commented on some of the police evidence, including some of his private notes.
In 2016, he wrote according to NRK that the couple were facing a possible divorce and could lose a lot of money.
– I think this sounds strange. The notebooks were easily accessible, about 17,000 pages, I have nothing to hide. You may have written that divorce is always a way out, but who gets divorced after 49 years? When I write about challenges and problems, I include everything, both the good and the bad. All scenarios, the billionaire told NRK.
Hagen noted that immediately after the disappearance, and on their own initiative, the police gave access to the notes and personal notes.
– They seem to have ignored all the positive things on these pages when they try to paint a negative picture of me, Hagen told NRK.
Did you bring it with you? The police are leaving traces of “Åsted Norge”
In an email to VG, defense attorney Svein Holden writes that the notes mentioned are old and that they are “documents that Tom Hagen has voluntarily given access to the police to see if they can find the explanation of what happened to his wife”. ».
– So there are no documents that he has tried to hide from the police investigation team, or that the police through a thorough investigation have found.
Supporting the police: This is why Tom Hagen is innocent
The defender also writes:
– The email contains various allegations that were obviously made with the intention of damaging Tom Hage’s name and reputation, and the content of which unfortunately appears to be based on selective leaks of police case documents.
Holden writes that the information, as they see it, is not relevant to the case nor does it give any explanation as to why Anne-Elisabeth Hagen disappeared. The defender believes that “everything seems to have been raised with the intention of adding stones to the weight, possibly trying to create division and internal discomfort in a grieving family.”
– Tom Hagen can only repeat one more time the same thing he had previously told NRK. He has not killed his wife and has not contributed to her abduction, Holden writes.
VG has also presented the information in this case to the police.
– The police do not want to contribute to VG mentioning private notes. Therefore, we have no comment on the questions, writes Police Inspector Agnes Beate Hemiø in an email.
She had previously told Nettavisen that the police evidence at this time is not strong enough for a prosecution.