– The sickest thing that has happened so far – VG

“This is the sickest thing that has happened yet,” attorney George Conway told CNN of the unusual case.

He is married to former Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway, and was previously a member of The Lincoln Project, a group of Republicans working for Trump’s re-election.

Conway’s remarks come after the state of Texas on Tuesday took the unusual measure of asking the US Supreme Court to overturn the results of elections in four states where Joe Biden fled with victory; The transition states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

Did you bring it with you? – “Game over” is coming up for Trump

Attorney General Ken Paxton is behind the lawsuit, arguing that the legislative changes that were introduced in these states to facilitate voting by mail during the crown pandemic are illegal.

– We must always ensure that our voices are protected and that they matter, writes on demand in Twitter.

US President Donald Trump and his allies have made multiple allegations of voter fraud in various states.

The accusations have been rejected by both experts and various local authorities, and the Trump camp has not presented its demands.

Secretary of Justice of the United States: No evidence of electoral fraud was found that could alter the result

Believe that electoral votes should not be counted

There are 538 voters from the various states who formally nominate the next president of the United States, and this will happen in a vote on December 14.

It is common for states to nominate voters who vote for the candidate who has received the most votes in the state.

According to CNBC in the lawsuit, Attorney General Paxton in Texas writes that the votes of voters in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan “should not be counted,” and asks the United States Supreme Court to deprive states of the opportunity. to nominate voters based on the results of the elections.

Biden has received 306 voters after the election, while Trump has 232:

The Texas lawsuit comes on the same day as an important date in the electoral process: all election results that are approved by the end of Tuesday, December 8, are protected by a little-known law in the United States, the so-called “safe harbor law.” “. This means that the results in these states cannot be reviewed.

“The idea that the Supreme Court should have a procedure where states attack each other’s rules for voters is crazy, and they won’t do it at any point,” George Conway told CNN, adding:

– It’s absurd and embarrassing.

Don’t think the court will take the case

Trying to get rid of voters who are loyal to Trump rather than voters who will follow voters’ wishes has been described as the president’s last chance to reverse defeat in the November 3 presidential election.

This weekend it became known that Trump has tried to pressure the governor of Georgia to act, while on Monday it was known that he has called the leader of the Congress in the state of Pennsylvania with a similar request.

However, according to Paul Smith, professor and electoral law expert at Georgetown University, there is little chance that the Supreme Court will take the case from Texas.

“The state of Texas does not have the opportunity to complain about how other states count their votes and how they will conduct the voting of the voters,” he told the Reuters news agency.

If there are disagreements about the conduct of the elections, it is up to the congressional board to resolve them when they meet for the formal calculation of electoral votes on January 6.

“I don’t want to think that the court wants to be dragged into this,” Constitutional Professor Ned Foley of Ohio University told the news agency.

“Really embarrassing”

State authorities in all four states have also taken a hard line against the lawsuit, he writes. Reuters.

– Confidence in our democratic system is crumbling, and it is not due to the people of Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia or Pennsylvania, but to biased officials like Mr. Paxton, who puts loyalty to one person over loyalty to the country, says Michigan Democratic Attorney General Dana Nessel, adding that she believes the lawsuit has the stamp of being an attention-grabbing stunt.

Pennsylvania Democratic attorney Josh Shapiro calls the lawsuit an irresponsible attack on the state’s electoral system, while Wisconsin Democratic attorney Josh Kaul calls it “really embarrassing.”

Georgia Republican Attorney General Chris Carr says the following through his spokesman:

– With all due respect to the report, the Texas prosecutor is wrong about Georgia, both in terms of law and fact in the case.

The US Supreme Court has already rejected a request from Republicans in Pennsylvania, who wanted the court to intervene after the state Supreme Court rejected their case to invalidate 2.5 million mail-in votes.

The decision is considered a major defeat for Trump. Just hours before the decision was known, he asked the court for help. where he himself has nominated three of the judges:

– Let’s see if anyone has the courage, be it a member of the Legislative Assembly or a judge of the United States Supreme Court, or several justices of the Supreme Court – let’s see if they have the courage to do what everyone in this country knows which is correct. he said Tuesday, according to the Washington Post.