– The behavior of Trump’s lawyers is a national disgrace – VG

Chris Christie has long been one of the closest to the president, but it seems the friendship has drastically cooled.

– I have supported the president, I voted him twice, but the elections have consequences and we cannot continue pretending that something has happened that has not happened, says Christie.

In an interview on the ABC television channel, the former governor of New Jersey is not kind when mentioning the acting president.

“Honestly, the behavior of Trump’s attorneys has been a national disgrace,” Christie said.

He says that Trump and his campaign have failed to present evidence of their repeated allegations of election fraud, and that it is time to put the country first.

“If you have evidence, present it,” he told CNN.

– Outside the courtroom, they claim that there has been fraud, but when they enter the courtroom, it is not fraud that they are suing and prosecuting, he says.

Dissociates from a lawyer

Trump has repeatedly claimed that the presidential elections were steeped in cheating and fraud, and has therefore denied the result.

His campaign continues to challenge the integrity of the elections by initiating a series of lawsuits in the tipping states.

So far, they have filed or lost more than 30 lawsuits, according to CNBC.

Christie in particular highlights the rough ride that Georgia’s Gov. Chris Kemp (right) has had.

– Sidney Powell accused Kemp of crime on television, but is not willing to go on television to defend and present the evidence that he claims to have, Christie thunders.

Attorney Sidney Powell, who he had previously referred to as one of his attorneys, said in an interview with the conservative television channel NewsMax that both Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger had received money to alter the results.

When conservative anchor Tucker Carlson on Fox News asked Powell to provide evidence, she refused, according to USA Today.

– When we kept asking her if she was angry and we asked ourselves to stop contacting her. When we consulted with others in the campaign, they told us that Powell had not provided them with any evidence either, Tucker said.

– Ridiculous behavior, says Christie.

Late Sunday night, the Trump campaign distanced itself from Sidney Powell.

– Sidney Powell practices law on his own. She is not on the president’s legal team. She is also not the president’s attorney personally, write Rudy Giuliani and attorney and consultant Jenna Ellis. in a statement issued by the Reuters news agency.

Powell herself says in a statement to NBC that she understands the statement and will continue to fight what she calls “massive voter fraud.”

Powell received attention Thursday for several allegations of election fraud and conspiracies he made during a news conference hosted by Rudy Giuliani. The accusations were denied as “fantasy stories” by the AP news agency.

Despite hard work, Trump’s campaign attorneys have made elementary mistakes in their lawsuits.

The AP writes that they have forgotten the judge’s name in the courtroom in the middle of a hearing, brought a Michigan-related lawsuit to a court in Washington state, and had to rewrite and resubmit complaints after removing The arguments. they were going to prosecute.

They are also said to have overlooked the term “election watcher”, which is an election watcher, and written “post watcher”, which means post watcher, in court documents.

Eliminated in court

The Trump campaign’s hopes of winning the presidential election in court were not bolstered by Giuliani’s efforts in court this week. It was the first time since the 1990s that Giuliani filed a case in federal court, and Judge Matthew W. Brann appeared several times to lose patience with the attorney, writes the Washington Post.

The case that Giuliani had brought to court was the Republicans’ attempt to stop approval of the election result in Pennsylvania. Giuliani’s case is based on the fact that two voters who voted for Trump were not allowed to change their ballots after a mistake, which they claim Biden’s voters were able to do.

– You claim that you refused to vote for two individual applicants. But basically, you are asking this court to invalidate more than 6.8 million votes. Can you tell me how this can be justified? Said the judge.

Giuliani replied that it was only about invalidating 680,000 votes, since Republican observers could not attend the recount. But Giuliani had forgotten that part of the suit had been withdrawn by his own team.

– The accusations around the observers were withdrawn, they are no longer a case reported to this court, so why should I consider them? Asked the judge.

Giuliani responded that they would file the lawsuit again, for the third time, and would reconsider this claim.

The Trump campaign lost that lawsuit on Saturday, and the judge issued a strong ruling rejecting the accusation of widespread cheating with early votes, according to NTB.

Judge Matthew Brann writes in his ruling that when Trump calls for “the staggering result” that nearly 7 million voters will lose their right to vote, the plaintiff is expected to present compelling legal arguments and factual evidence of widespread corruption.

– But it has not happened, writes according to the news agency.

The Trump camp notified a Pennsylvania court on Sunday that they are appealing the decision not to postpone approval of the Pennsylvania election result.