[ad_1]
DECISION OF THE NORWEGIAN FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION throwing out the cards and not declaring war on the health authorities was a good decision. As the situation is in society, with infection rates out of control in several large cities, there would be losses every day.
There are not two away victories in Bucharest and Austria, and public opinion is concerned, although we cheer Norway every day.
It is the volunteer work that tries to get the R number below 1.0 that is applied.
Canceled: – I have a clear answer.
THAT IS NOT SAID that away matches against Romania and Austria were not entitled to the law. The moment Health Minister Bent Høie placed the issue in the gray area of the law, he opened a door to the League of Nations.
Therefore, Lise Klaveness was brought in from her maternity leave for a couple of days.
The legal competence of the top soccer director was soccer’s last hope.
COULD SAFE It would have been interesting to challenge the relentless stubbornness of the health authorities, but no, it would never be a game that soccer could win. In any case, the other side of the coin would be a massive loss of reputation.
Three points in Bucharest, three more in Vienna and a Nations League victory would have brought Norway to the highest level in Europe and given us a better ranking when the World Cup groups against Qatar are tied on 7 December.
However, the aftermath of the obvious challenge on Saturday night, and I know many who hoped and believed that the NFF would put the plane on the wings overnight, would reinforce the impression of soccer as a privileged, oversold and self-centered industry. .
– A legal gray area
THEN I HAD LOTS Launched, the football leadership realized that it was about emotions and politics, not laws. In that sense, it didn’t matter if the NFF thought it had a good case.
It was a game against a goal.
They couldn’t win.
FOR US AS has questioned the rigid attitude of the health authorities and their unwillingness to grant the waiver of current regulations, the case will be a demonstration of power in the exercise of the crown policy of Team Erna. Feel free to say that the different country strikes again.
54 countries under the UEFA umbrella believe that the drafted protocol is a good tool.
The number 55, Norway, doesn’t mean it.
54 countries in Europe say it is possible to play soccer and practice good infection control at the same time.
Given the current situation, Norway will not even consider that idea.
INSTEAD, THE MINISTER OF HEALTH CHOOSES Bent Høie to be formulated in a way that says that football has nothing to complain about. In Norway, it’s about equality, and football has had enough.
When top-level football reopened in June, no one else had a chance.
NOT THE HIGH He says, is that first-class football was opened with a protocol that football, the Sports Association and the health authorities developed jointly. The authorities did not provide any services.
It was a pilot project.
IN THAT PERSPECTIVE It is quite shocking to bring “old services” to market. What has happened now is a new case with a completely different topic. The snow that fell last year is not relevant. The authorities will not differentiate even if the possibility of dispensation is, of course, there, everything is under one comb.
In a dark moment, the situation becomes even darker.
NFF: National team players can travel home and abroad despite quarantine
IN NORWAY the covid-19 regulation establishes that “People in quarantine may exceptionally use public transport to reach a suitable quarantine place.” That permission has now been granted by the municipal superintendent.
That is the paradox of the matter.
The players were not allowed to fly together to Romania, as a cohort in a charter plane with all that implies automatic infection control, but they have every right to fly back to England, Germany, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Holland and Denmark.
Why this is so, only the law knows.
As long as the path never wisely defies reason, it will remain so.
