[ad_1]
COMMENTS
Who now dares to trust Great Britain in international negotiations? asks Einar Hagvaag.
Internal comments: This is a comment. The comment expresses the attitude of the writer.
Prisky sports and dishonest gambling he is no stranger to Boris Johnson, the British Prime Minister. Yesterday, the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, announced legal action against the United Kingdom for breach of the divorce agreement. The relationship between the UK and the EU is more bitter than bitter, as the ninth, and according to the latest plan, round of negotiations on the future relationship between the parties began this week.
Johnson made two surprising plays before this round. If a deal is not ready by October 15, then there will be no deal, it was said first. The second was to propose a law that involves a revenge with the EU over the Irish border.
The murder on Fifth Avenue
First It came as some surprise because it is the British who have dragged out the negotiations for a long time, and Johnson has refused to ask for a postponement of the final recess at New Years. Smells like negotiation tactics. But the second involves breaking a signed international agreement. This naturally sparked outrage in the EU and political unrest at home. Is the British prime minister trying to fool the EU or is he trying to scare the EU into making concessions at the last minute? They both seem useless, so what’s the plan?
In between, he has expressed both “full faith” in reaching an agreement and “fearless” if this does not happen. Britain’s exit from the EU, dubbed “Brexit,” continues in chaos as he chaotically manages the corona epidemic. He posted photos of his summer vacation in Scotland with his partner and children and something resembling a Sami or Mongolian tent. Was he on a “tent vacation”? But the tent turned out to be on the outskirts of a not-so-cheap country house, and a Scottish farmer fell into a fire on his land. Was the marquee the place to think about the EU and the crown?
The strongest card of the Armed Forces
That is to say the least It is sensational to see and hear a British minister openly admit to the House of Commons that he violates international law. Was it not in Great Britain that the rule of law was conceived, where it is governed by law? But that’s what Northern Ireland Minister Brandon Lewis said. With the UK’s internal market bill, Johnson is trying to overturn the divorce deal with the EU, which he signed and was approved by Parliament in January.
“We cannot make Europeans believe that they have the power to divide our country,” the prime minister told the House of Commons.
mens it was precisely Johnson who agreed to “divide” the country to achieve the divorce agreement. It agreed to allow Northern Ireland to continue in the EU customs union and to follow the EU internal market rules, in order to keep the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland open in accordance with the Good Friday Peace Agreement.
But then a customs border arises in the Irish Sea between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK. “No British prime minister can accept this,” said Johnson, who had accepted it, echoing his predecessor, Theresa May. Instead, it agreed to keep the whole of the UK within the customs union and accept the EU’s common market rules.
The most important choice of our time.
To break an agreement reached with the EU also caused a stir in Johnson’s Conservative Conservative Party. May asked bitterly in the House of Commons: “How can the government assure future international partners that they can trust the UK to abide by the legal obligations in the agreements the country signs?”
Two former prime ministers, John Major of the Conservatives and Tony Blair of the Labor Party, who played a major role in bringing peace to Northern Ireland, warned against the bill in a joint newspaper article. It jeopardizes the peace agreement and embarrasses the country, they wrote. Jonathan Jones, the government’s top legal adviser, resigned when he saw where it was going before the bill was introduced.
Mud bath in the trench
The law raises opposition and outrage in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. In their own way, they fear the consequences of a bitter and complicated break with the EU. Furthermore, they see dangers to their internal self-government in this law. Scotland will have a new referendum on independence and will continue in the EU. Northern Ireland wants an open border with Ireland.
I ga Johnson expires in September to repeal the law. It was Wednesday. On Monday, Vice President Maros Sefcovic reiterated the demand when he met with British Withdrawal Minister Michael Gove, who immediately rejected it. The lower house passed the law on Tuesday and sent it to the upper house.
The EU has now emphasized seriousness and asked Johnson to stop playing. The EU has “put a revolver on the table” during the negotiations, Johnson said recently. Åkkesom; Either the negotiators can sit in secret, ‘enter the tunnel’, as it is called in the EU, and see if they can find light, or the British will plunge into the unknown on New Years with chaos so much along the Irish border as on the border of the canal.
[ad_2]