– A great victory – E24



[ad_1]

The environmental movement is pleased that the Petroleum Fund is launching its first “climate shocks” four years after Storting’s March order. The fund also makes its first withdrawals from coal companies after criteria were fine-tuned last year.

This is one of Germany’s RWE coal power plants in Neurath.

INA FASSBENDER / Reuters

Published:,

– We are very happy, says Frode Pleym at Greenpeace Norway to E24.

On Wednesday night, the Petroleum Fund announced that it is expelling several coal companies, as well as four Canadian oil sands producers. This is the first time that the Fund has adopted two new criteria that have not been used before.

– It is fantastic that the new carbon criterion is actively used. None of these companies has anything to do with the fund. It’s also surprising that they tackle companies with tar sands problems, says Pleym.

“This is noticeable and has an effect on the management of other funds,” he adds.

According to Bloomberg’s calculations, the Petroleum Fund has downloaded shares for around $ 3.3 billion ($ 33.4 billion) after this round of sales, based on holdings the fund has declared in the New Year.

Greenpeace Norway leader Frode Pleym.

Johanna Hanno

also read

The Oil Fund with Heavy Spring Cleaning

– A great victory

Else Hendel, Senior Advisor on Sustainable Finance, is also pleased.

– A great victory for WWF and Greenpeace, Zero and the Future in our hands that we have struggled with, email E24.

– It is good news that the largest coal producers in absolute numbers are finally out of the Petroleum Fund. There was a great weakness in the old view that the oil fund was invested in the main coal producers, as long as these companies also operated with much more, so the proportion of coal was generally small, he writes.

The future in our hands has also been very critical for the coal investments of the Petroleum Fund.

– Hurrah! Finally, Norges Bank excludes some of the oil fund companies with unacceptable greenhouse gas emissions. We have been working on this for a long time, writes Anja Bakken Riise in the future in our hands in an email to E24.

She believes that the Petroleum Fund still has a job to do and wonders why it has taken so long.

– Our common savings money has long supported climate damaging activity. The Ethics Council has done painstaking work, but has stopped at Norges Bank, Riise says.

– Norges Bank must follow up on the Storting decision, and here we also lose faster decisions and exclusions. Other funds are faster in the field than this without acting “irresponsibly,” whereupon the bank bases its collection, she says.

Leading Anja Bakken Riise in the future in our hands.

Butt, Mariam / NTB scanpix

First use of the climatic criterion.

The first four companies expelled from the Petroleum Fund for climatic reasons are active in oil sands in the province of Alberta, Canada.

These companies include Suncor Energy Inc, which is also active on the Norwegian continental shelf with ownership in fields and discoveries such as Oda, Fenja and Beta, in addition to Imperial Oil Limited, Canadian Natural Resources Limited and Cenovus Energy Inc.

The draft results after an evaluation of “actions or omissions that, at the aggregate level of the company, lead unacceptably to greenhouse gas emissions,” according to the Norges Bank. The bank’s board of directors has the final say in such decisions, and they base their decisions on the recommendations of the Ethics Council.

also read

The sale of the coal oil fund is delayed: – It is completely useless.

Has Norwegian businesses

Among the companies that have now been expelled under the strictest criteria for coal is South African Sasol, who along with Equinor, Gassnova and Shell are co-owners of the CO₂ testing center in Mongstad.

Furthermore, Norges Bank is launching one of Germany’s largest energy producers, RWE, along with commodity giant Glencore, AGL Energy Ltd and Anglo American PLC.

European power company Uniper SE is being watched, along with BHP Group Ltd / BHP Group Plc, Vistra Energy Corp and Enel SpA, according to Norges Bank.

Finn’s Fortum, which owns 73.4 percent of Uniper’s shares, is also active in Norway, including the waste incineration plant in Klemetsrud.

Fortum company for observation:

also read

The Finance Committee supports Siv’s proposal: Strengthens the carbon requirements for the Petroleum Fund.

– Very good

Zero is also pleased that the Petroleum Fund is taking new steps. They hope the background will turn even greener to avoid fossil energy loss when energy conversion accelerates.

By Kristian Sbertoli, finance manager for Zero.

Alexander Eriksson

“It is great that the Petroleum Fund is now finally in the process of excluding companies that have a business that is particularly damaging to the climate,” says Per Kristian Sbertoli, CFO of Zero.

– In the past year, the world’s financial markets began to take climate risk seriously in a way that puts increasing pressure on all companies to transform a business that can make money even in a world that is achieving climate goals . The Oil Fund has an important leadership role, he says.

also read

The Petroleum Fund on stricter coal requirements: can increase costs

Waiting for further renovation efforts

– We hope that the Petroleum Fund will take climate risk into account even more in the future, says Sbertoli.

He believes the drop in oil prices after the corona crisis may be an indication of what energy markets will look like after climate change. He believes that coal and gas will suffer the greatest losses, while renewable energy appears to be a safer investment.

“This should lead to a new assessment of whether the Petroleum Fund should not be able to invest a larger portion of the fund in unlisted renewable infrastructure, and begin such investments more quickly in emerging economies as well,” says Sbertoli.

The Oil Fund has opened the door to invest up to NOK 100 billion in renewable infrastructure, such as wind or solar energy. Earlier this year, the manager of the Norwegian Petroleum Fund Yngve Slyngstad said the fund could make its first purchase of such activities as early as 2020.

also read

The Ethics Council and the Norges Bank disagree with the Petroleum Fund: waiting for new advice on the climate

also read

The former manager of the Petroleum Fund opens up to harsher climates: – A cross of thought

also read

Swedish pension fund takes climate control: sells Exxon shares

[ad_2]