[ad_1]
The Seimas member, the curator Žygimantas Pavilionis and the communication specialist Mindaugas Lapinskas spoke about it on the Lietuvos Rytas Nauja Diena television program.
Psychologically prepared
Commenting on the scandal over the search by officials of the Special Investigation Service (STT), M. Puidokas told Lietuvos Rytas television that it was a possible smokescreen due to the Pavilionis scandal. For his part, Ž.Pavilionis stated on the “New Day” program that he did not understand such a connection at all.
In a video posted Tuesday with Russian provocateurs posing as the Kremlin opposition Leonid Volkov, Pavilionis urged the interlocutor not to heed President Gitan Nauseda’s opinion that the president is symbolic.
Even before the STT scandal, M. Puidokas stated that the position of Spokesperson for Seimas URK “is not the position where he can learn from his mistakes”, so Ž.Pavilionis, according to him, should retire from these positions.
Ž.Pavilionis stated that he regretted that his colleagues at the Seimas used the Kremlin material.
“You can never rely on Kremlin material to try to stab your colleague in the back. Next time, such material will be created against M. Puidoka, Mr. Surpl or Mr. Skvernelis. I will definitely support them, because we are in a state of hybrid warfare ”, Ž.Pavilionis said during the fair.
The MP said he knew that such a video would appear in public, so he was preparing psychologically, but the most unpleasant, according to him, “the betrayal of his own.” Ž.Pavilionis clarified that the “own” – also the opposition politicians, and the objective of this attack, according to him – is to divide.
“Let’s not betray our friends, let’s not try to enter their personal lives, even my wife was attacked, greeting us with her partner. Even her dress is touched. This is low. This is what the Kremlin does with people, as did the Soviets. Let’s respect ourselves, human dignity, “said Ž.Pavilionis.
An idea acceptable to voters
At the time, communication specialist Mindaugas Lapinskas said that one should not be particularly surprised by what Ž.Pavilionis said in the video distributed.
“And what did we learn about what he was thinking or saying something special? He fought G. Nausėda for a long time, speaks boldly about how he looks at the time, “he considered.
“On the other hand, he got into a pretty respectable company. If you look at what these scammers have deceived, then there are officials much higher than Ž.Pavilionis, ”added M. Lapinskas.
M. Lapinskas stated that he thinks that many Pavilions Ž. in the Seimas they think the same about G. Nausėdas. “And before that, probably many peasants thought the same about D. Grybauskaitė,” he considered.
According to M. Lapinskas, Ž.Pavilionis is a politician with rather strict views, who simply seeks to serve his constituency.
Talk to your constituents. We may not like him, but his constituents, those who are on a harder line of relations with Russia, he perfectly represents that line, ”said the communication specialist.
When evaluating the general image of Ž.Pavilionis after being misled by a provocateur, M. Lapinskas admits that this story did not adorn a member of the Seimas as a politician, yet for many the essence of the story is the statement of Ž. President.
“We all probably think that if you’ve already spoken virtually to a … cheater, you’ve turned out to be a bit of a loser. Still, for the most part, we see in this scandal not what he managed to fool, but what the president talked about. .
And since not many people talk about this president in the kitchen, I don’t think there is a big shocking story here, “he said.
Will have to go to the end
At that time, when commenting on the political future of M. Puidokas, M. Lapinskas considered that a member of the Seimas has no choice but to assume the image of a political martyr.
“He has always tried to present himself as a certain dissident, the only question is how much will it work. Based on the facts presented, it seems that this cord is winding up little by little, all the more so since it is not the first time. It is not difficult for people to imagine that they are very affected, there are other cases that do not end with other parts.
I don’t think that’s an advantage for M. Puidokas. You probably have no choice but to talk about being a citizen of some special meaning and being provoked by someone.
If you have already chosen not to tell the truth at all, now you will have to go all the way. I think this version is not the last, I think he will come up with something else ”, predicted M. Lapinskas.
