[ad_1]
But in order for tenants to be able to enter her apartment after moving out, the woman had to do everything possible: the cohabitants, who lived in the apartment, did not return the keys on time. And the woman was unable to find parts on purpose, so due to disagreements with the former tenants, the woman went to the police for help.
“I rented my apartment, but one day a neighbor informed me that the tenants had moved, she also mentioned that my belongings had been taken,” the woman said. – When I got to the apartment, I saw it was empty. Tenants not only added debts without paying utility bills, they also stole things they owned: an almost brand-new, unpaid computer, a refrigerator, a rug, a desk, and two chairs. In addition, they damaged two water taps, they were intentionally broken. “
The woman told authorities that the tenants moved out without notice and did not answer phone calls.
“I learned that this is not the first time they have done this,” said a Kaunas resident, noting that he had suffered damage of more than 700 euros.
Police officers did not have to seek an opinion for a long time: Dainius P., from Varėni, immediately admitted during the interview that he had embezzled foreign things.
The man said he had found an advertisement in the newspaper about the rental apartment; After contacting the author of the announcement, he arranged a meeting in the apartment for rent.
“We agreed on the rental price the same day, we concluded a lease, I lived in this apartment with my partner for about two months,” said Dainius P. – After that we decided to move, because the neighbor who lived in the end called the police for no reason. “
The man claimed that he had paid the agreed amount and utility bills for renting the apartment, but that he could no longer live due to the police officers they constantly called, so one day he put it all together and decided to move out.
“When I moved, I decided to get the foreign objects out of the apartment, I lied to my roommate that I had talked to the owner of the apartment and she had given me these things,” said Dainius P.
The man assured that he intended to return the embezzled items, but the day the owner of the apartment called him, he could not go to the apartment, he was working, so he did not have time.
“About a week later, the police called my partner and told him that the owner of the apartment had written a statement to the police about the stolen items from the rented apartment,” only then did Dainius P. admit that he had misappropriated the seized items.
“The roommate was very angry about my behavior, but agreed to go with me to the police station, we did not return our belongings to the hostess,” said Dainius P., who regretted her irresponsible behavior and promised to apologize to the hostess.
“I don’t know why I did it,” the man was unable to explain the reasons for his behavior to the police.
At the time, her partner, who did not even realize that her life partner had misappropriated the housewife’s belongings, told police during an interview that she would have lived longer in the rented apartment, but a neighbor bothered them.
“I was constantly unhappy, I was disturbed by the noise we were making, even though we lived in peace,” she said.
Dainius P., who was prosecuted for the misappropriation of foreign objects, did not escape the inconvenience: prosecutors turned over the investigation by the police to a court, which had no doubts about the man’s fault.
“In evaluating the evidence gathered in the criminal case and examined in court based on his internal conviction based on a thorough and impartial examination of all the circumstances of the case, the court found that the body of evidence was sufficient to reveal and demonstrate the guilt of the accused “, Dainių P. guilty of embezzlement of foreign property.
As Judge Loreta Janiulytė, who examined the case, pointed out, the fact that she admitted having committed a crime must be recognized as a mitigating circumstance.
“In imposing the sentence, the court took into account the nature and degree of danger of the crime committed by the defendant, the fact that he committed a crime that falls under the category of minor intentional crimes,” according to the court, Dainius P. he was not convicted before. – The court took into account all the circumstances, the seriousness of the crime specifically committed and the fact that the accused pleaded guilty. The court concludes that the objectives of the punishment can be achieved by imposing the type of punishment requested by the prosecutor: public works, the requested punishment will undoubtedly have negative consequences for the accused and will not lead to new crimes in the future, therefore the sentence will be concluded. . “
For misappropriation of foreign objects, Dainius P. was sentenced by the court to four months of public works, forcing him to work 25 hours without pay during this time. per month in the public interest.
It is strictly prohibited to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or anywhere else, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, DELFI must be indicated as the source.
[ad_2]
