[ad_1]
Representatives of the Freedom Party, Remigijus Šimašius, and a member of the Seimas Aušrinė Armonaitė addressed the President officially and publicly regarding the Law on Lukiškės Square. They called on the president to veto the law.
The newly formed “National Union” party, led by Vytautas Radžvilas, requested a meeting with President G. Nausėda in Lukiškės Square and the politics of state history in general.
“The decision by a single man from Vilnius Mayor R.Šimašius to establish a beach on Lukiškės Square is another attempt to avoid a properly organized state representative square in the Lithuanian capital and to deny the very idea of such a square.
The construction of the beach in the state square, which has symbolic meaning and a representation of the historical and political existence of the Lithuanian nation, has been a continuation of Lithuania’s increasingly open and nationalization policy for two decades and his last expression, “wrote representatives of organizations.
Did the President set aside time to meet with the authors of the letter?
A spokesman for G. Nausėda escaped the direct response.
“In recent weeks, the President received many letters and appeals from organizations and individuals regarding the law passed by Seimas and Lukiškės Square. The President highly values and respects the opinion expressed by them, and will make his decision on the law adopted by the Seimas taking into account the positions expressed by them. ” 15 minutes received the question of whether G. Nausėda responded to the invitation of the “National Association” to meet before the decision on Lukiškės Square.
The President especially appreciates and respects the opinion expressed by them, and will make his decision on the law adopted by the Seimas taking into account the positions expressed by them.
In an attempt to find out whether G. Nausėda had met with someone to discuss the Lukiškės Square law, A. Bubnelis indicated that G. Nausėda had not met, but his advisers. The presidency does not comment on who they have met with.
“Of course, there have been many meetings with advisers on this subject. In turn, they had meetings and conversations with people and organizations interested in the subject. This is the usual work of the advisers: before giving their opinion to the President, they are evaluated the opinions of many stakeholders, ”said A. Bubnel.
In an interview with LRT “Dienas subjects” this week, G. Nausėda herself said that she already has a decision, but appreciates the legal aspects.
“I could only say that I have the decision myself, but we would like to evaluate all the legal aspects that are in this law, evaluate them completely and only then make a final decision. So the law gave me a few days, but inside I am already decided, “said the president.
Earlier 15 minutes He criticized the decision of the Vilnius mayor to install a temporary beach on Lukiškės Square.
“In the President’s opinion, there are many convenient and more suitable places for Vilnius to install a beach. When installing such objects in the most important places in Vilnius, it is necessary to take into account the historical context”, – the opinion of G.Nausėda delivered by A.Bubnelis.
And what position did the former heads of state take regarding Lukiškšs Square?
D. Grybauskaitė lost the decisions on Lukiškės Square, but in 2018, when there was a conflict over the construction of the monument in this square, the then head of the country assured that all the monuments were directed to the past.
“And I would like to think about today, the future, because we see that there are people here, children,” he told LRT TV at the time. “Given my very personal allergy to monuments, I would leave this plaza alive so that people can enjoy it, use it, and make it accessible to all Vilnius residents and our guests.”
Photo by Lukas Balandis / 15min / Dalia Grybauskaitė, Valdas Adamkus
V. Adamkus had made it clear in his time that he would like to see the Vytis monument in Lukiškės Square and was glad that there were places for him at least in Kaunas.
However, V. Adamkus did not sign the law in Lukiškės Square, according to which the Seimas wanted to establish the square as the main representative square of the Lithuanian state with accents commemorating the freedom struggles.
The main reason for V. Adamkus’ veto was that matters regulated in the legal act should not be a matter regulated by law; These matters should be decided by the Municipality of Vilnius, taking into account the opinion expressed by the Seimas.
[ad_2]
