[ad_1]
On his Facebook account, the former minister wrote that he decided to forget about political correctness and express his opinion. In a controversial post, the minister speaks of relations between people of the same sex, gender reassignment, decriminalization of drugs.
“He may hate me for my opinion, but at least he will know what it is,” said the minister.
Here is the full record from A. Veryga:
“Political correctness will kill us …
This article prompted me to write after reading my prof course. Andrius Mac’s thoughts on his social media profile. He shared his thoughts on manipulative political correctness. Andrius writes in a confused manner, but rightly I agree with his thoughts. I especially liked the metaphor of “frozen hake eyes”
It was a good opportunity to think, and what are my eyes.
I must admit that I have had to face political correctness many times. Politics is generally considered an art of compromise. I agree that compromises must be sought to achieve political goals. But always? And today, I see some politicians trying to please as many people or colleagues as possible, so clearly and without expressing a position or avoiding it. I admit that the temptation is very great. You don’t want a “radical” or inflexible politician label. They don’t want anyone. Because in the long run, even those who support it will start to be afraid to back up your opinion. I have heard it many times before in my direction. Nobody wants to become an outcrop of “hills” or other “influencers” sharing “jams” that leave all the contents of the last lunch.
But is that really true? Now let’s live for those who have the most followers on facebook or instagram? Will we live up to those who, if necessary, can scoff with hundreds of thousands of signatures? All for the sake of peace and fear of damnation?
If our parents or grandparents had feared condemnation for their faith and views, Lithuania would probably never have been a free country. Therefore, do not be afraid of pronounced “celebrities”, because on behalf of the followers they would change their minds, even several times a day. They have done it more than once.
But let’s get back to the point. Lithuania is definitely at the crossroads of very serious decisions. It will depend on these decisions how we will live for decades to come and whether our society will face intense social engineering. And I don’t mean a pandemic at all.
I’m talking about decisions that are more important to people than pandemics, because pandemics come and go. However, changes in people’s value systems are factors with much greater creative or destructive power.
Today, various formats speak of changes in the concepts of family, language, gender or, more precisely, of attempts to apply aggressive measures of social engineering to change these concepts.
All of these areas touch on our constitutional or United Nations conventions, or are simply trying to deny natural biology.
Schools already say that it is not normal to be determined by your gender. I think it’s normal to have a variety of questions, but for most, that question didn’t even come up before ultraliberalism. The absolute majority knew what gender they were. The ultra-liberals think that this is not enough. They believe that opportunities for gender reassignment should be provided even before the age of majority. Just great. Gender change is impossible because it is encoded in our genes, if we are already talking about biological sex. To change it, it means seriously damaging the body through surgery or extremely aggressive doses of hormones. It is often mentioned in this context that it is not a disease or disorder. In that case, the dear ones want to ask, what are we going to do there with the surgery and the hormones if it is not a disorder? And if we talk about social gender, when a person imagines himself as something, then at different stages of life we have different imaginations and they change rapidly. There are even very exotic imaginations. Will we complete them too? And another very modest question. And how many times is it planned to allow a gender change? If it is already possible once, why not twice, four or even annually?
Family. Another bastion of fundamental value. Family is work. First with yourself. Hard work, sometimes disappointing, but rewarding in the end. Life is born in the family. However, it is believed that it is no longer necessary. Now the family can be called by any name. If you already want it to be a marriage between a man and a woman, here is the marriage of a woman and a woman who considers herself a man and will be a family. If it is a “family” of two men, their children will be born to surrogate mothers. Never be fooled, same-sex marriage is not an end in itself. After the legalization of the same-sex family, the possibility of adopting children will undoubtedly be sought. This is already the case in politics. You can rarely achieve what you want. Therefore, to pursue what can be achieved, leaving new steps for the future when the political context is more favorable. Changing the concept of family is only the beginning. Sometimes asking about the concept of family brings you full circle. In this context, I have had to ask myself what I consider a disjointed question of whether I do not consider grandparents as families if I am only in favor of marriage between a man and a woman. I really don’t understand the logic of such questions. And what are those grandparents going to marry and have children with? Anyway, they are already a family and do not need to be artificially renamed in some way.
I have more than one gay acquaintance or friend. They are great people. None of them participate in this show of Marxist ultraliberalism.
Drugs A force that destroys the body, the personality, and the integrity of society. The force of which the sages carry billions, and those who believe in them steal the dose, deny the future or even begin to kill. It is an addiction that we now want to call freedom. I miss a ship like that. After all, in theory, the prison is freely selectable. The willingness to steal or commit violence is also gratuitous. Should we decriminalize them too? What are reckless decriminalization advocates, whose supporters draw pictures of marijuana on posters, really looking for? Definitely not decriminalization. I am in favor of criminalizing minor offenses, and this needs to be addressed, but don’t be fooled. There will be no stopping here. Even the conferences of defenders of decriminalization speak of decriminalization (when there is no longer responsibility for consumption) and legalization, as some other countries have already done.
I have more than one addicted friend. They are also great people. Damaged and often suffering, but wonderful. Help others to get up. They do not believe that drug addiction should become the norm in society because they know where it can end.
Here’s a colleague A. Matulas, who, having previously tried to beat up the “mainstream,” felt comfortable criticizing the farmers’ alcohol control measures, and when he saw the results, he wanted it to be credited. As public support increases, you will want to contribute to it. But it still pays you to seek political correctness and say that you hear that liberals have the right to review everything, and maybe something is really wrong. This is a position that is not a position, but as my colleague Andrius Macas says, it is a demonstration of the ‘frozen hake eye’, still trying to maneuver in a way that is good for everyone. And good is never good for everyone. It will be good for the millions that are carrying or for the people and their children. You still have to decide. There are far fewer buttons to vote in the Seimas than the social genres: only three and only two actual positions.
Apparently, with this speech, I will finally be classified as obscure and backward by “mainstream” writers. According to recent polls, rural people support me more as a politician. I understand that these dark people get more support from rural people and people with less education. Most of Vilnius are the same third-generation newcomers from the “people” who look on with such derision. And aren’t those “villagers” the most sincere? They rarely think of political correctness. The people have always been a support for the country, whether it was necessary to eat or soldiers to defend the country. I am happy to be of rural origin and I believe that political correctness will be put in the country at least for some time. You can hate me for my opinion, but at least you know what it is. “
[ad_2]
