[ad_1]
Photo by Judita Grigelyts (V)
The ruling peasants initiate an unscheduled session of the Seimas to satisfy the request of the Lithuanian Polish Electoral Campaign Christian Union (LLRA-KS) to submit a request to the Constitutional Court (CC) for violations during the Seimas elections.
Now signatures are being signed that an extraordinary session will be held on Wednesday, that the Constitutional Court will be appealed to the Constitutional Court by a resolution of the Seimas, Ramnas Karbauskis, president of the Union of Lithuanian States and the Union, told BNS on Tuesday.
According to the Statute of the Seimas, an unscheduled session of the Seimas must be held if requested by at least one third of the members of the Seimas, that is, no less than 47 parliamentarians.
According to the state, Seimas President Viktoras Pranckietis was unable to make a unilateral decision to reject LLRA-KS’s request to apply to the CC for violations of the Seimas elections and the possible substantial impact on the results.
According to the chairman of the Seimas Law and Order Committee, the peasant Agns irinskiens, that decision can only be made by the Seimas.
The president of the Seimas certainly cannot, because (in the BNS law) it is established that the decision is made by the president and the Seimas. The president is a one-man body, but the president of the Seimas is certainly not equal to the Seimas. The Seimas is a collegiate body that makes decisions in the form of a resolution and takes them collegially, says BNS A. irinskien.
The Speaker of the Seimas, no matter how good or bad, cannot usurp the power of the Seimas, he added.
The commission chairman was also surprised that MPs were not even informed about the received LLRA-KS sentence.
in this case, the members of the Seimas, if not the media, do not even mention it. But I can’t confuse the search text, said A. irinskien.
According to her, the mechanism for appealing the results of the Seimas elections established by law raises doubts about the 48 hours provided. deadline for the Seimas and the president to make a decision and on the assignment of the role of mediator to these institutions.
I think the safest way would have been for the president or now the Seimas to run and leave the possibility to the Constitutional Court for evaluation, says A. irinskien, BNS.
The fact that the LLRA-KS has caused them fears and a possible falsification of results in the Paneri-Grigik district is reason for the CEC to request a pre-trial investigation and for the multinominal to clarify the situation with that announcement. I think that due to punctuality and the search for practice during the next elections, the best option would be to leave the decision that paid for to the judges of the CC.
On Tuesday, the president of the Seimas V. Pranckietis announced that he did not intend to initiate an appeal to the Constitutional Court, since he did not delay in violating the electoral law of the Seimas.
President Gitanas Nausda also rejected the request of the party led by Valdemaras Tomaevskis to appeal to the Constitutional Court.
The law stipulates that participants in the Seimas elections may appeal to the Seimas or the President within 24 hours of the decision of the Central Election Commission, and the Seimas or the President will address the Constitutional Court with an inquiry into the violation of the electoral law of the Seimas within 48 hours.
LLRA-KS claims that the Seimas election laws violated the campaign started by public figure and leader Andrius Tapinas, who sought to prevent the party from entering parliament.
The Central Election Commission affirmed that the All the Best, Voldemortai campaign and the All the Best, Valdemarai publication was a negative advertisement for the LLRA-KS, but the electoral campaign was not lost because neither A. Tapinas nor Laisvs TV participated in the campaign politics.
Tapin says he has not passed any legislation and that the action cannot be equated with a political campaign.
The reproduction of BNS information in the media and on websites without the consent of the UAB “BNS” is prohibited.
Rayti komentar
[ad_2]