[ad_1]
Photo 11Editorial file photo
Kaltina’s Theft
The Supreme Council in 1991 on January 8 adopted a resolution composed of the temporary commission of the deputies of the Supreme Council Albinas Januška, Ryšardas Maceikianec, Algimantas Sėjūnas, Valerijonas Šadreika and Z.Vaišvila in 1991. January 8 to investigate the facts in the House of the Supreme Council. On that day, the pro-Soviet organization Jedinstvo tried to occupy the Supreme Soviet and carry out a coup. Or 1991 January 13, the parliamentarians formed a commission to find out the circumstances of the disappearance of Prime Minister Albert Šimėnas.
“The Board of Directors of the Club of the Signatories of the Independence of Lithuania, headed by me, after the commemoration of January 13, 2001. requested the Board of Seimas to publish the material of the activities of these two commissions. It turned out that the Materials collected by these commissions had disappeared from the Seimas, although there were no official documents confirming that they had been officially delivered to anyone.
On several occasions I have publicly appealed to the Public Prosecutor regarding the theft of these historical documents that confirm important events for the Lithuanian state. However, so far the prosecutor’s office has not responded in any way, “Z. Vašvila told Vakaro žinios.
Therefore, yesterday he wrote to the Attorney General to open an investigation into the theft of this material.
“I know that this robbery was committed by personal order of the President of the Supreme Council, Vytautas Landsbergis. During the interrogation at the Prosecutor’s Office, taking an oath to the Constitution of Lithuania, I will provide all the information I know about it, I will point out the people to whom Vytautas Landsbergis stores or continues to store the material of these two commissions.
I reasonably believe that Vytautas Landsbergis’ public rewriting of important events in Lithuanian history and a public lie may be a deliberate diversion of attention from these and other potentially criminal acts of him. A quick and objective investigation is necessary, first of all, regarding the preservation and use of these documents for the needs and interests of the Lithuanian state and its citizens, but not for a narrow circle of people. These documents should be freely available, ”writes Z. Vašvila to E. Pašilis.
Engagement material
The signer says he has known the circumstances of the robbery for a long time, has repeatedly spoken in public about it, but the prosecution has not responded. So you are now approaching the Attorney General in person, hoping that he will be more effective.
“Not only the conclusions of the commissions have disappeared, but also all the audio recordings with interviews with many people: Romualdas Ozolas, Kazimiera Prunskienė, V. Landsbergis himself and others. V. Landsbergis is interested in the disappearance of this material, because at least due to the disappearance of A. Šimėnas, it seems very “shit” – please use this word, “- asked the signatory to” Vakaro žinios “.
Dose of dirt
According to Z.Vaišvila, V. Landsbergis falsifies history and in other ways.
“July 31 Every year Lithuania commemorates the anniversary of the Medininkai massacre. There is a tradition that V. Landsbergis speaks at the Medininkai booth during ceremonies. In his speech this year, Landsbergian, as he knows it (speaks , but with such formality that it is not limited to words), he openly said that Zigmas Vaišvila was sitting in the hospital with the customs officer Ričardas Rabavičius seriously injured until August 2. He died. Understand, maybe even a pillow suffocated Such an important witness, and the courts and the prosecution do not even question a “high official Vaishvila” (then I was deputy prime minister).
I will not explain to V. Landsberg that at that time, due to my duties, I did not have time for activities such as sitting in hospitals, that the prosecution and the court, but not Zigmas, decide what to question. Last year, when questioned in court in the case of January 13, I saw clearly how the court did not want to hear what I had testified. He would probably look for the roots of the investigation into the disappearance of the vending machines used in the Medininkai massacre maintained by the police. These vending machines were seized during an inspection of the trunk of a car on the border with Belarus. And I would like to ask Vytautas Landsbergis, how is it that he, who is not involved in the process, knows the material from the Medininkai massacre cases, which for some reason are artificially separated from the Vilnius OMON cases? And why does this tireless provocateur and blackmailer continue his own black activity? ”Asked the signatory rhetorically.
Who is the provocateur?
Z.Vaišvila has more questions for V.Landsbergis.
“For example, why on March 19, 1991 after Audrius Butkevičius’s arrest in Vilnius OMON, the obscure deputy Arvydas Svetulevičius, who was on duty in the Lithuanian Ministry of the Interior, constantly instructed us that our police would attack the base of Vilnius OMON with a gun. Why did Zigma have to ask you not to do that, and A. Svetulevičius categorically forbade you to carry out, by the way, your illegal instructions to shed blood? Didn’t the conversations between Deputy Prime Minister Z. Vaišvila prove and Vice Minister of the Interior Peter Liubert that the peaceful path of negotiations was our path? Because on August 23, 1991 In a demonstration near the Republican Library, he sent a crowd to storm the KGB palace, where a company of KGB border guards was waiting to fire on the invaders? Wasn’t it better to choose the path chosen by the representative of the Government of Lithuania Z. V ašvila to summon the authorized representative of the Government of the USSR A. Lebedev and himself in 1991? August 23 Signing the first agreement of the Republic of Lithuania with the USSR on the liquidation of the KGB in Lithuania? ”Z. Vašvila asked questions.
He does not rule out the possibility that in 1990 April 20 The events in Vilnius, at the Maironio street printing house, where, in addition to Z.Vaišvila, who was carrying out the order of the Presidium of the Supreme Council, the internal army of the USSR wounded several dozen of our unarmed green bandages were also a provocation by V. Landsbergis.
“At least that is what Artūras Skučas hastily described in his book” Infantry Notes. “Why did you keep silent, Vytautas Landsbergi, when in 2014 November 3, January 13 Maironio str. Cases The Attorney General’s Office ended the episode with the Vilnius Higher Party School of the Central Committee of the CPSU. March 11 Dalia Grybauskaitė, the future president of Lithuania, worked for a long time, episode? She did not even blink when Judge Stasys Lemežis explained in the Vilnius Regional Court ruling that the 25 victims, Maironio str. following the resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Council of Lithuania under his leadership, were found guilty because the internal army of the USSR performed law enforcement functions (in independent Lithuania, the occupation army! ), And did we object? For some reason, you explained to me then that this provocation is the work of Audrius Butkevičius. However, Artūras Skučas, who was not very careful, could not or hide the content of their conversations and yours before this event, “said the signatory.
[ad_2]
