[ad_1]
R.Raziūnas is also required to use an electronic surveillance device and not leave the house, if it is not related to participation in court hearings.
According to the case data, A. Raziūnas has been arrested since February 8, 2017, the last time he was detained for another three months on April 14.
The 15-minute investigation department into the possible crimes of A.Raziūnas published the investigation “Holy Bills”: publications, video program and the first audio series in Lithuania. You can listen to it here:
A. Raziūnas, who appealed against this court decision, stated that even in complex cases, the detention period cannot be automatically extended, and the courts should seriously consider the application of milder preventive detention measures. He emphasized that he had been in custody for more than three years and that the longer a person is held in custody, the more carefully the need to do so should be analyzed.
Andrius Raziūnas, previously convicted of theft, robbery and fraud, is being charged with 43 more crimes.
He also considered that the court had not evaluated his social ties, continued his detention for purely formal reasons, and violated not only the Code of Criminal Procedure but also the requirements of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
After examining the complaint, the Lithuanian Court of Appeal determined that A. Raziūnas had been arrested as he could be a fugitive from the court, obstructing proceedings and commit new crimes, but these reasons for arrest were insufficient.
“The Court of First Instance gave broad reasons for its decision on the need for further arrest of the accused, but in the present case, taking into account the extremely long time spent in the detention of Eimantas Andrius Raziūnas, this motivation is not yet enough, “the court ruled.
“The motives of the courts due to the seriousness of the crimes committed, the possible concealment, the obstruction of the procedures, the probability of new crimes cannot justify an unreasonably long period of detention, since these motives become less important with the Time and purposes of pre-trial detention can be achieved with milder pre-trial detention. ” Jolanta Čepukėnienė, Justas Namavičius and Algimantas Valantinas.
The court also mentioned that the examination of the A. Raziūnas case is currently complicated due to the quarantine, and the hearing schedule has not been drawn up there. It should be noted that in almost two years there have been only about 20 court hearings in this case.
After evaluating these circumstances, the court ruled that the objectives set out in the Code of Criminal Procedure could also be achieved through more lenient preventive measures.
Andrius Raziūnas, who was previously convicted 15 times of robbery, robbery and fraud, is currently accused of two accomplices for 43 crimes.
During the pre-trial investigation, it was established that the clients of the debt collection company Turtuvos grupė registered in Kaunas were deceived. The owner of the company is A. Raziūnas’ wife, Agnė Raziūnė, accused of transferring the company’s customer data to her husband at the Praveniškės Correctional Center. By having this information and using various fraud schemes, the defendant often cheated older people with large sums of money.
In this case, 38 people identified as victims suffered more than 600,000. Material damage.
[ad_2]
