[ad_1]
The parliamentarians would like to ask the CC if during the Seimas elections a large-scale information campaign “All right, Woldemortai” is being carried out in the electoral district of several members of Andrius Tapinas and the public institution Laisvės TV against the electoral campaign Lithuanian Polish – Union of Christian Families (LLRA-KS) violations in the single-member electoral district of Paneriai-Grigiškės no. 11 had a significant impact on the Seimas elections.
The text of the petition was signed by the “peasants” of the Seimas, social workers and representatives of the Lithuanian Polish Electoral Campaign-Union of Christian Families.
During its approval, 62 members of the Seimas voted in favor of the draft resolution, 23 against and 10 abstentions.
He assured that Seimas was in danger of making fun of such an initiative
Jurgis razma
Jurgis Razma, a member of the Lithuanian Christian National-Democratic Union (TS-LKD) faction, promises to abstain from voting on the Seimas resolution.
“If, after the election, there are reasonable doubts about the violations, and there are opportunities for the Seimas to react to them, few of us would object to that opportunity to verify the CC, as is the case with those violations. There is a condition for this: such action must be carried out in accordance with the law, and the content of said appeal must comply with the Constitution and the law, ”said J. Razma.
According to the politician, if such a resolution were approved, the Seimas would mock the CC for its legal illiteracy. He pointed out that there is a delay in the deadline to apply to the CC.
“The legal department stated that the request had to be submitted within three days after the request was accepted,” Razma said.
According to him, the content of the judgment itself also raises questions.
“Both the laws and the Constitution clearly establish that a resolution of the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) that does not recognize a violation of the laws on elections to the Seimas must be appealed. We must criticize the CEC’s October 31 decision to reject the LLRA complaint and not think about the content of critical posts or speeches by A. Tapin, ”said J. Razma.
He also noted that the content of the appeal itself contained false statements.
“It is argued that the LLRA did not have the opportunity to respond. I have reviewed the LLRA complaints, which have been written to the CCA, and in no case has there been a complaint about the possibility of a counter opinion, ”Razma said, noting that A. Tapin himself mentioned that he had offered a against opinion before publishing the publication.
He considers it important to regulate such things for the future.
Rita Tamašunienė
Rita Tamašunienė, representative of LLRA-KŠS, taught that the party filed the complaint on time.
“The Seimas had to consider the draft resolution 48 hours after announcing the results of the elections. Our party presented the complaint on time, but the president of Seimas, not fulfilling his duties, did not inform the members of the Seimas, no organized a session, ”said R. Tamašunienė.
The LLRA-KŠS representative asked the CC for the opportunity to comment on the complaint and assess the situation, which, in his opinion, is not unequivocal. He said that Laisvės TV was not a registered information provider at all.
“The most relevant issues at that time were the elections. A candidate is selected to be praised and a party against which only negative information is presented. This was done during the closed period, ”said R. Tamašunienė.
In his opinion, it is important for the future to regulate the participation of third parties in the campaign. The MEP is convinced that such an effort does not prevent citizens from expressing their opinions.
Proposal for an emergency procedure
Victor francis
© DELFI / Josvydas Elinskas
The spokesperson for the Seimas Viktoras Pranckietis provided his information when he received the request from the LLRA-KŠS.
“I received the first letter from Valdemar Tomaševskis to the position of member of Seimas on October 26. The letter was received with a complaint of similar content, which was forwarded to the Public Administration and Municipalities Commission, the commission found no need to consider it or not consider it, ”said V. Pranckietis.
According to him, another letter was received through the Deputy Member of the Seimas on November 1, at 4 pm 37 minutes, which is a little over 25 hours later.
“Therefore, I did not have any initiative to use the Seimas Elections Law and there was no point in convening a session. (…)
November 3 in the morning, letter of October 31. sent to the general post office of Seimas in the evening and as you know the Janceliarija works according to the labor code and does not work during the holidays, opened on the third day and downloaded the letter via WeTransfer, said V.Pranckietis .
The President of Seimas stated that in order to resolve the situation, he proposed to consider the resolution as a matter of urgency.
After the discussion, 60 members of the Seimas voted in favor, 29 against and 9 abstained.
75 members of Seimas supported 75, opposed 8, abstained with special urgency.
It is strictly forbidden to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, it is necessary to indicate DELFI as the source .
[ad_2]
