[ad_1]
When this changing case reached the SCL, they were taken by a trio of judges, but the latter adopted an intermediate verdict: “The proper application of the Criminal Procedure Law in this case may mean a new interpretation of the rule of law in jurisprudence. and be important in shaping uniform jurisprudence. Therefore, the case will be transferred to the expanded panel of seven judges of the Criminal Cases Division of the Lithuanian Supreme Court. “
The latest verdict was especially awaited by a widow who was seeking justice for about 4 years and the daughter of a woman who was killed out of resentment. “They are cold-blooded, murderers without remorse,” Qatar Mazgelis once said flatly in court.
“After all, Raskazova lives in a society where certain behavioral norms are common. It didn’t hurt my mom to think she was dead! They took a living person and threw him into the river,” Inga Mazgelytė made no secret of her disappointment.
Instantly understand
- According to the data in the case, in the spring of 2016, in the village of Butėnai, Panevėžys district, on the farm, the accused, along with residents of farm G. and A. Mazgelis, consumed alcoholic beverages.
- Later, when they decided to drive, they saw G. Mazgelienė, the 52-year-old farm owner, lying under the wheels of a Peugeot 307 car.
- Unaware of the pulse, she thought she was dead, scared, dragged, and thrown into the river. The fisherman accidentally found the body in the Lėvens River only after 19 days.
- The investigation and criminal case were controversial and changeable from the start, and overall, the trial started not in the district court but in the district court, as the prosecution did not discriminate against the accused Raskazov for intentional murder, but only for negligent life.
On the afternoon of July 2, A. Mazgelis arrived at the LAT palace and his daughter waited for the information by phone. The 7-judge verdict did not allow victims to breathe easier, but overall it was gratifying, even despite the fact that the process takes more than four years: the case is returned to the Lithuanian Court of Appeal.
The SCL’s decision takes 14 pages, which can be summarized as follows: all the judges who have examined this case so far have left too many contradictions in history, and without removing them, no final verdict for the Raskazov spouses can be recognized as justified and legitimate.
The Court of Appeal did not follow the principle of a thorough examination of the circumstances of the case, did not adequately corroborate the procedural decision, and reached contradictory conclusions.
“In the proceedings before the court of appeals, that court did not respect the principle of a thorough examination of the circumstances of the case, did not state the appropriate reasons for the procedural decision, and drew contradictory conclusions on the application of criminal law. The violations of the Code of Criminal Procedure are substantial, which prevented the court of appeals from making a correct decision, therefore, the judgment of the court of appeals is annulled ”, – the 7 members of the extended panel of the SCL followed their signatures .
The Court of Appeal in this case, in which it 15 minutes Detailed in previous posts (see related articles), it will probably take again only in the fall.
[ad_2]
