[ad_1]
The decision was made after it was established that no act had been committed with indications of crime or misdemeanor, the Attorney General’s Office announced on Tuesday.
“The analysis of the data collected makes it possible to reasonably affirm that during the search for a person the objective was not to restrict the freedom of a member of the Seimas. The ruling indicates that the use of physical force by the STT agents was appropriate to the situation to seize the two telephones specified in the judicial sentence, to which Puidokas, who had not complied with the instructions of the agents , was actively opposed, “the prosecution writes.
The decision to refuse to initiate the pre-trial investigation was made after examining the statement of M. Puidokas. The parliamentarian requested an assessment of whether the STT officials had acted with signs of abuse during the search of his person and the use of coercive measures.
The sentence of refusal to open the investigation establishes that, according to the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court and the practice formed by the courts, for the causes provided in the legal acts it was possible to apply a procedural coercive measure against the deputy of the Seimas. M. Puidokas: personal search to seize objects of criminal importance.
This decision of the prosecutor may be appealed to the investigating judge in accordance with the procedure established by law.
Police are conducting a pre-trial investigation into the alleged 50,000 incident at the premises of Seimas Matas Maldeikis, assistant to Kęstutis Motiečius, assistant to M. Puidokas, a member of the Labor Party faction. bribery in euros. According to the investigation, the Seimas member could have personally supported and influenced other colleagues to postpone indefinitely the entry into force of the provisions of the Gaming Law that prohibit the operation of slot machines not connected to the data management system of slot machines electronic
In the present case, allegations of bribery and influence peddling were brought against Mr. Motiečius and Samoil Kac, owner of the gambling and betting company Tete-A-Tete.
M. Puidokas was questioned in the investigation as a special witness. This status is granted to a person when questioned about their actions, but there is no reason to be suspicious.
On June 10, STT agents conducted a search of the Seimas member’s office. M. Puidokas stated that he had experienced violence during the search: the first was strangled by officers, his clothes were torn, his hand was torn in blood and his personal belongings were taken away.
The STT claimed that the mobile phones were forcibly taken from a Seimas member after he refused to provide them, the officials’ actions were lawful, and the parliamentarian could attempt to erase data important to the investigation.
Puidok, for his part, claims to be persecuted for his political activities, and statements about his attempt to erase important information, he said, degrade his dignity.
[ad_2]
