[ad_1]
As the court announced on Monday, the union claims that it has approached the Kaunas city municipality administration three times in writing, requesting coordination of the march on specific routes, but the defendant refused to issue coordination documents in each occasion, citing formal and declarative documents. and substantially hostile statements.
The petitioner alleges that the refusal to coordinate the routes due to the alleged unjustified interruption of the flow of traffic in Kaunas and the fact that the Laisvės alley is too narrow for the march is partial and discriminatory. According to the organizers of the march, several massive events have been held in Laisv Alley in recent years: s: Women’s Solidarity March, Kaunas Autumn Fair, Kaunas City Birthday, Basketball Fans’ March, Kiemų šventės encounters.
The petitioner requests that the court make an urgent decision and oblige the administration of the Municipality of the city of Kaunas to coordinate the route of the march from the “Soldier of Liberty” monument on Jonavos Street, St. Gertrūdos Street. , Laisvės Alley and Šv. Archangel Mykolas Church (Crew) (Soboro) and Mykolas Žilinskas Art Galleries.
If the court decides that it is not possible to compel the Kaunas city municipality administration to coordinate this route, the court is requested to compel the defendant to coordinate another route, which would start from St. Archangel Michael (Crew) Church Laisvės Alley to the Kaunas City District Court and return the same way. The plaintiff also requests that the court examine the appeal as a matter of urgency and order the defendant to pay the costs.
The court informs that it will first decide on the admissibility of the complaint, and then the response of the accused will be awaited.
[ad_2]
