The Frenchman turned his back on the “Poles”: he rejected the complaint about the electoral results



[ad_1]

Previously, President Gitan Nauseda did that.

“The president of Seimas does not intend to initiate an appeal to the Constitutional Court on the basis of the complaint of the Polish electoral campaign of Lithuania – the Union of Christian Families (LLRA-KŠS)”,

According to the head of parliament, the circumstances indicated by the LLRA-KŠS, against which the election results are contested, do not violate the law on the election campaign. V. Pranckietis recalled that this decision on this situation was made by the Central Election Commission last week.

“However, the president of the Seimas would draw attention to the fact that a separate group of members of the Seimas could also submit an application to the Constitutional Court. Such an appeal would require the support of a fifth of the members of the Seimas,” said the commentary.

On Monday, President G. Nausėda rejected LLRA-KŠS’s request, claiming that the party had not provided substantiated arguments that serious violations of the electoral law had been committed during the organization of the elections.

In the complaint, the party led by MEP Valdemaras Tomaševskis claimed that the law on elections to the Seimas had been seriously violated by a campaign launched by the publicist, host of the Andrius Tapinas program, to prevent the party from entering parliament.

The Central Electoral Commission approved the results of the Seimas elections on Saturday. The commission determined that the “Todo bien, Voldemortai” campaign and the publication “Todo bien, Valdemarai” were negative LLRA-KŠS advertisements, but did not violate the electoral campaign law, as neither A. Tapinas nor “Laisvės TV” participated in the political campaign.

Tapin says he has not violated any legislation and that the action cannot be equated with a political campaign.

According to the law, participants in the Seimas elections can appeal the decisions of the Central Election Commission to the Seimas or the President within 24 hours, and the Seimas or the President will address the Constitutional Court within 48 hours. with a question related to the violation of the Electoral Law of the Seimas.



[ad_2]