[ad_1]
“During the execution of the sentence, the convicted person has been promoted thirty-three times, has no current sanctions, continues to work in a prison with motivation, has positive provisions on supervision, does not express provisions for criminal support, maintains social relations with relatives, has the right to live in an apartment with the family, no violations were recorded.The convicted person behaves in a motivated manner, tries to show positive changes, the behavior of the convicted person during the execution of the sentence is consistent and aimed at correction behavior in a positive sense ”, says the court ruling.
In 2008, M. Čebelis was sentenced to 17 years in prison.
He, along with the general, robbed the store. They attacked and tied the tape with duct tape, and then surrounded the owner with the ties he was selling.
Later, disguised as a policeman, M. Čebelis and two gang members broke into the money collector’s apartment.
The gang’s most brutal crime is the murder of a car dealer. At first, they only planned to rob him, but then decided to get rid of the victim so that he would not complain to the police.
The court noted that M. Čebelis is serving a custodial sentence for six intentional crimes, two of which are classified as serious and one as very serious, he committed the crimes while working in an organized group, he was previously acquitted and this circumstance was valued by the court. , undoubtedly reveals the inappropriate attitude of the convicted person before the norms of morality and behavior accepted in society, it shows that in the evaluated case he committed the crime not accidentally, but because of the negative values formed.
“In the present case, the part of the custodial sentence not served for a serious and very serious crime committed still does not allow to unequivocally conclude that the release of a convicted person from parole would fulfill the purpose of the sentence, implement the principles of individualization and justice “,.
The court, after evaluating the circumstances, found that the convict’s positive correction processes must still continue in the correctional home, establishing positive patterns of behavior that would help the convict adapt in society and promote only his legal behavior.
The ruling can be appealed to the Kaunas Regional Court within 7 days from the delivery date of the copy of the ruling, according to the notification of the Kaunas District Court.
[ad_2]
