The car was not driven, and the tripod recorded 50 km / h. speeding: “I would have paid the fine”



[ad_1]

Suggest a topic to [email protected]

“When we received the message, the quarantine was already established and I know exactly that it would not go anywhere. So now you have to remember every time where it was, where it was going, to know exactly that it really was not there and did not exceed the speed” The woman did not hide her outrage.

The speed was reported to have been exceeded by almost 50 km / h.

He claims that the information sent indicates that the speed was exceeded by almost 50 km / h. The rape was recorded in Kaunas, on the highway, near the footbridge on April 7. And the notice of the fine received reached the “delinquent” on April 9.

The police lifted the sentence but did not apply

The woman appealed to the police with a complaint. It was then possible to discover that the fine was effectively imposed on a car that was not a reader.

“It was discovered that no such car numbers were recorded, not even such a car. And if he had not gone anywhere, would he have paid that fine?” The woman asked.

She was also outraged that she had to write several letters to clarify the situation. Admittedly, it was gratifying that the fine was lifted very quickly.

That is not the end of the story. The woman claims to have printed an email response confirming the cancellation of the fine and went with him to the police station in Kaunas; I wanted to receive an official stamp and be sure that the fine has been canceled and that there will be no problems in the future.

“Since I am not the owner of the car, it belongs to my husband, although I drive it, nobody spoke to me, the man explained everything to me. Then I printed everything: both the sentence and the letter sent that the fine was lifted. We went to the police to pass a resolution to make sure the fine was lifted, but no one agreed to do it, “said the woman.

Police: errors occur

The Lithuanian Highway Police Service states that, unfortunately, such errors occur when the protocol of an administrative offense is not drawn up in the presence of the suspect or who committed the offense.

“Such cases sometimes occur when an administrative offense report is prepared pursuant to Article 611 of the Administrative Offenses Code. Ty The Automatic Number Plate Recognition System (ANPR) incorrectly recognizes the plates. In the event that you mentioned, the administrative crime report was written to the owner of the vehicle “, – in response 15 minutes declares the LCPT.

No need a stamp

According to the LCPT, a stamp is not required on documents proving that the fine has been canceled.

“At the insistence of the person, the officer could use his seal (with the name of the police institution, his position, name and surname) and sign, indicating the date,” reports the LKPT.

So it seems that in this case the situation was easily cleared up as the car was known to be unused, but what if the fine was sent to someone else who uses the car frequently and could not track if it could have been registered or not?

The LCPT states that the person who received a fine must always carefully examine the information received.

“If you notice that the report of an administrative violation was incorrectly written (for example, the wrong vehicle was registered, the incorrect registration was registered), you should immediately contact the police office with the contacts (email, phone) indicated in the report and provide information. Police officers, after receiving information about the erroneously written protocol of administrative misconduct, cancel it, correct the indicated (identified) errors, “the LKPT states in the comment.



[ad_2]