The Board of the Seimas will not hold an unscheduled session of the Seimas, the Frenchman spoke about falsification of documents

Only after the beginning of the Board session was there only one item on its agenda, namely the convening of the Seimas session. However, the Spokesperson for Seimas V. Pranckietis explained that he could not be summoned, because a document with signatures could possibly be falsified.

“I affirm that this document is possibly falsified, the same last name is repeated twice, I have more suspicions. That the members of the Seimas who were not present yesterday signed the testimony of my companions, that then there were no companions, ”said V. Pranckietis.

At the same time, he assured the members of the Seimas Board that only 45 signatures had been collected, so the session could not take place.

“I can say: Rita Tamašunienė and Jaroslav Narkevič, on the second page apparently they signed before,” said V. Pranckietis.

“You are insightful,” commented Seimas Rima Baškien primer First Vice President.

“There is no reason to call the session, and I am going to submit a request to the Ethics and Procedures Commission,” said Seimas President V. Pranckietis. And the session of the Board of the Seimas concluded.

Asked about possible infractions

On Tuesday, the “peasants” collected the 47 signatures needed to hold an unforeseen plenary session to approve the Seimas resolution “On the investigation of the Constitutional Court.”

According to the Statute of the Seimas, an unscheduled session of the Seimas must be held if at least one third of the members of the Seimas request it in writing, that is, no fewer than 47 parliamentarians. The Seimas Board will notify the Seimas members of its preparation and the matters submitted for consideration, either during a regular session of the Seimas or through the media at least six hours before the beginning of that session.

“If the Seimas Board will report (on the next meeting – BNS), it will be at 6 pm theoretically a meeting can be called in the evening. A three hour break is required at the time of decision. I am trying to calculate that the proceedings should end well after 9 pm, ”Agnė Širinskienė, chair of the Seimas Law Enforcement and Committee, told BNS on Tuesday.

He wonders why it is not possible to hold a Seimas Board session on Tuesday night or early Wednesday morning remotely.

“Can you imagine if it is said to meet on Wednesday night, what will happen to the quorum?” Asked A. Širinskienė.

The head of the committee noted that the legal deadline for deciding to apply to the LLRA-KŠS was under pressure.

It stipulates that participants in the Seimas elections can appeal against the decisions of the Central Election Commission to the Seimas or the President within 24 hours, and the Seimas or the President will address the Constitutional Court within 48 hours with a request. in relation to the violation of the Electoral Law of the Seimas.
According to A. Širinskienė, the deadline should be calculated from the moment the Seimas members were informed about the LLRA-KŠS application received.

“The Seimas is not really informed that such a letter has been received. The president of the Seimas did not send any document. There are hours of work and, apparently, it must be calculated based on when the members of the Seimas find out,” he said.

“The Speaker of the Seimas can see a lot of this intolerance. She herself has announced that the Seimas will not be applied anywhere, now the meeting of the (Board of the Seimas – BNS) is delayed,” said A. Širinskienė.
He also emphasized that the president of the Seimas could not on his own turn down the LLRA-KŠS request to submit an application to the CC.

According to the parliamentarian, only the Seimas could make a decision on the investigation of the CC.

On Tuesday, the president of Seimas V. Pranckietis announced that he did not intend to initiate an appeal to the Constitutional Court, as he did not see a violation of the Seimas Elections Law.

Previously, President Gitanas Nausėda also rejected the request of the party led by Valdemaras Tomaševskis to appear before the Constitutional Court.

The LLRA-KŠS claims that the Seimas election law was flagrantly violated by a campaign launched by the publicist, host of the Andrius Tapinas program, with the aim of preventing the party from entering parliament.

The Central Election Commission stated that the “Todo Bien, Voldemortai” campaign and the “Todo Bien, Valdemarai” publication were negative LLRA-KŠS advertisements, but did not violate the electoral campaign law, since neither A. Tapinas nor “Laisvės TV “They participated in the political campaign.

Tapin says he has not violated any legislation.