[ad_1]
We fill
Gediminas Vaitkevičius, who is on trial in the case, is charged under two articles of the Penal Code: defamation and violation of public order.
At the court hearing, S. Skvernelis’s wife said she had noticed the note while driving home with her daughter, but did not immediately stop to see what was written on the asphalt.
“To avoid seeing any inscription on a minor child,” he explained.
However, the politician’s wife pointed out that she had already realized that her husband’s last name had been written.
S. Skvernelė stated that he would soon return to the scene to see what the inscription was after taking a photo of him.
The wife of the former prime minister questioned in court stressed that not only “the thief’s house”, “Skvernelis” were written on the asphalt, but also an arrow was drawn with the inscription “1 km”, but also the letters ” v “and” a “.
“This inscription is offensive, hurtful, slanderous to my whole family because they are the names of my family, my husband, my son. The note caused me anxiety, because the note was actually written about 1 kilometer from our house, which means that the person who wrote the note knew exactly where we live, prepared in advance and consciously, “said S. Skvernelė in the cut, highlighting that the person who left the notes had to buy special paint, measure the distance, and come write a note at night.
He said he didn’t think anyone from the local community could have done it.
The former prime minister’s wife said she felt tension and anger that the incident was widely discussed in the media.
He said that he tried to protect the boy from this information for fear that he might start to fear being at home.
“I tried to keep the children out of these matters,” he emphasized.
In response to the defense attorney for the defendant, Dovile Murauskienė, S. Skverneló clarified that one child is too young to know and the other to know.
According to S. Skvernelė, she then thought that the note had been left by a man who was still enraging her husband.
“I did not think that those people could behave in this way,” he said, taking into account that G.Vaitkevičius worked in the presidency and the Ministry of Transport and Communications.
When asked how the man felt about it, S. Skvernelė suggested asking the politician, but then assured him that he was offended.
“We feel slandered, insulted,” he said at the hearing.
“The case, he said, was distinguished by the fact that the neighbors who saw the inscription were increasing in the media,” he said.
When asked if communication with neighbors had changed after this event, S. Skvernelė replied in the negative.
He said the community was outraged that the prime minister was slandered because River Street was paved after years of community members writing letters calling for the road to be paved.
A. Dautaras: I took the bicycle to the police station
Arūnas Dautaras, the head of the VAT Force Management Board, said at the meeting that he had received information from officials who had stayed with the Prime Minister about the banknotes and had come to inspect them. A. Dautaras said he took the note.
Photo by Vidmantas Balkūnas / 15min / Arūnas Dautaras
“I asked my colleagues to mount more and patrol that night. “I asked my colleagues to call services so they could delete the note,” he said.
15 minutes recalls that G. Vaitkevičius was arrested on the night of June 11, when he was returning to the same place where the notes had already been left.
When G.Vaitkevičius explained why he returned to the scene, A.Dautaras did not remember.
According to A. Dautaras, in the evening he received information that a person who had been able to leave notes and had come to Upės Street had been arrested.
The official said that he had presented G.Vaitkevičius’s bicycle to the commissariat himself.
A. Dautaras stated that he considered the notes an insult. When asked by the defense attorney why the panel was taking care to erase the notes if they could be considered as evidence, the officer emphasized that the note had been photographed.
Mr. Murauskienė asked why he contacted the city of Vilnius and not the district services to wash the note. A. Dautaras said that he did not do it himself, but that a colleague did it.
“The Vilnius district has no means to do that, I don’t know. And I don’t know who came to Grinda, not Grinda,” he said.
S. Skvernelis claims to have been slandered
A little earlier the court questioned the VAT He remembered the events of the night of June 11 near the house of the then prime minister.
S. Skvernelis, questioned at the previous court hearing, stated that he had been defamed.
“Defamation that does not correspond to any reality. I have never been charged or convicted of being a thief. It has caused many personal experiences, both for me personally and for my wife and my young son, who understands everything, ”he said in court.
This, he said, undermined his reputation as a politician. He stressed that the information provided in the media despised him as a person.
[ad_2]
