Political scientist on changes in the Nausėda team: there are two different scenarios

Critic Tadas Ignatavičius assured on the show that it is still quite difficult to assess the reasons for such a big change in Nausėda’s team.

“It can be explained simply that it is a kind of mutual cooling, a precipitate of the advisers and the team of one. With a little joke here, and basically speaking of what is happening, a few questions must be answered: does the change of people means that the people on the Nausėda team face some special shocks, some turbulence or there are fires that the spokesmen of the president? Can’t put out ?, the advisers or the chancellor, probably is not.

Another question is whether the changes that are taking place now mean that we will now see some special change, a breakthrough, which is probably not the case either. Of course, it is important to note that these changes, the regrouping of the team, are taking place in the context of certain presidential failures, to put it mildly, but it could very well have been determined by these members resigning, ”he says. critical.

When asked what the main stumbles and failures of Sediment could be, the reviewer assured that listing all the failures might not be enough for the entire program.

“We see that Nausėda has not been very successful lately. If we start to name all the clicks, we will not have enough of the whole program. At a certain stage of failure, the president is, frankly, the question of whether this is a problem for the team of the president or for the president himself, that should be the question. Obviously, such setbacks and failures are difficult to deal with both for the president himself and for his team. The team is quite weak, it has been talked about since it was announced. It was said that the team could be stronger because the president himself has little experience, it would be easier for him and the president had to get used to a new role that is difficult, ”the interlocutor on the program also spoke.

Named the weaker side

The political scientist Rima Urbonaitė says on the Delfi diena program that a lot of speculation has been heard these days, which led to such changes in the Nausėda team.

“There are two scenarios: either the homeowner is dissatisfied with the team, or some team members are dissatisfied with the homeowner. We can see two completely different scenarios, the real one of which is hard to tell, but I’ve heard a lot of speculation on this, if that’s the case. get update (update) equipment, something will change radically. The president is not a construction of lego figures, the advisers are not the ones who build the president from those blocks.

Simply changing the advisor will not change the president. It is very important to understand what the role of counselors is. Its function is basically to protect the president, because he is given the maximum information so that he does not get lost in the information flow, certain templates and messages are prepared so that he can communicate better ”, says R. Urbonaitė.

When asked which are the weakest sides of Nausėda, the political scientist mentioned the errors in the communication line.

“You see and hear yourself according to what you communicate. One of the weakest lines to admit is the communication line. We also see the biggest changes in that line. In the communication team, we have a third person designated during this period to attend to communication problems. Those communication errors are difficult to avoid, from micro errors to much more serious errors, even strategic ones.

“Micro-content is basically tweet control, when you congratulate Estonia on Independence Day a few days later, then we can take it to a more serious level, what content is communicated,” said R. Urbonaitė at the fair.