[ad_1]
The police announce that the Visaginas Police Station was investigating a case of administrative misconduct against Seimas member A. Š. administrative offense.
We remind you that in 2020. On December 20, the deputy of the Seimas, without any reason, violated the restriction of movement in the territory of the Republic of Lithuania between municipalities, arrived from the District Municipality of Ignalina to the Municipality of Visaginas.
2021 January 4 in accordance with Article 573 of the ANC of the Republic of Lithuania A summons to visit Utena aps. The LSC will provide the Visaginas Police Station with an explanation of the administrative offense committed and the preparation of an administrative offense protocol.
On Friday, when the MP arrived at the Visaginas branch of the Utena County Police Chief Commissariat, a protocol of administrative misconduct was drawn up.
Officers waited for the store to leave
On December 21 last year, A. Širinskienė described a meeting with police officers on Facebook. She wrote that she decided to return to Vilnius from her home in Dūkšte.
“Monday is a weekday. But … the fuel in the gas tank is only 50 kilometers away and the question is, what will happen to an empty refrigerator? I just didn’t have time to shop, because Thursday’s session of the Seimas lasted until the night, then I drove home right away and then driving control was introduced … “the politician wrote.
She and her husband decided that before going to Vilnius, they would visit a gas station in Visaginas and buy food there.
“The hour 21 is approaching, when traffic controls will be reduced and circulation will be freer before the work week,” explained the politician in his decision.
“8 pm 50 min. I am at the Visaginas border. Although the workday of the position is coming to an end and the police position will soon be retired (as it was when I returned), the policeman stops. “Maybe you will at least let me buy fuel?” There is an objective reason enough for this, “wrote A. Širinskienė on Facebook.
Already after 9 pm A. Širinskienė visited the shopping center, where the police were waiting for her after shopping.
“I rush with the fuel (20 hours 55 minutes, as indicated by the receipt from the gas station). And on the way I stop at the local LIDL, already at 9 pm The store is almost empty, so I throw the essentials and, quickly, in the box. On 08/21 the check is drawn and … the police are already waiting here. It turns out that in his opinion, after refueling, he no longer had the right to buy food, ”wrote A. Širinskienė about meeting with the police on Facebook.
The police officers informed the parliamentarian that his actions would be reported to the management and the politician would be invited to question him.
“My attempt to explain to them that I have to buy food for a man is insufficient for them. So I look forward to hearing from you and answering all your questions. Also, the reasons why I buy food for my husband at Visaginas, and we will be able to discuss whether buying food for an at-risk person who does not go to the supermarkets himself is an objective enough reason to visit the store after buying fuel, “he wrote . A. Širinskienė
She was in awe of the new government’s decisions to restrict movement on holiday weekends.
“With the logic of a paramilitary state approved by the rulers last Sunday, I could not have come to my family’s house in Dūkšte, which has been my home since I was born in 1975: neither my declared place of residence nor my property” . she wrote.
The politician A. Širinskienė wrote on the social network that the changes made by the government on Monday after turning the stick on Sunday allowed “other objective reasons” to leave the municipality of the declared place of residence.
“So, he allowed me to go home from Vilnius to Dūkštas. I hope that the desire to return with the spouse at least on weekends is an ‘objective reason.’ I wanted to believe that buying food in my circumstances in a municipality other than the one you have declaring your place of residence and where you do not have any property is an objective reason to move. Especially when you buy food for a week for a person at risk, even for a person who belongs to several factors “, he ironized.
The politician wrote that he understands that he was wrong. “Unfortunately, I was probably wrong, because, as I have experienced today from the police officers, shopping is only possible in the municipality of your declared residence, even if that municipality is a good 130 kilometers away and the person who is going to eat the food is here, “he explained. A. Širinskienė.
The parliamentarian was surprised that government resolutions were drafted without considering all life situations.
“I don’t know how far we’ll go with such a perception of state governance, but I’m very hopeful that the stinging restrictions won’t end up putting people at risk in stores just because someone didn’t think through all of life’s situations and tested all people when preparing the resolution of the Government. judged by a shoe “, wrote on Facebook a representative of LVŽS in the Seimas.
It is strictly prohibited to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in the media or anywhere else, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, it is necessary to indicate DELFI as the source .
[ad_2]
