[ad_1]
Drunk Kaišiadorys’s rage was caused by the idea that a woman who had consumed alcohol with him on the morning of the same day was already having fun with other men, so he offered a man to find out about the relationship when they met. in the garage.
S. Ž., Who arrived at the agreed place with a friend. He was seriously injured by a shotgun blast to the neck. The man’s life was immediately extinguished and V. Anuprevičius ran from the crime scene by car.
But a few hours later, the killer was arrested. He admitted his guilt, it is true that he defended himself, having accidentally fired the shot and did not want to kill anything.
The sentence is 11 years.
V. Anuprevičius was found guilty by the court of murder and illegal possession of a firearm.
He was sentenced to 11 years in prison for murder. He was sentenced to 1.5 years for the weapon, but when they were combined, it was decided that the retiree would spend 11 years behind bars.
Two victims of the murderer were sentenced to 4 thousand. EUR property and 17 thousand. compensation for moral damage.
V. Anuprevičius filed an appeal to reduce the amount of the penalty and the amount of non-pecuniary damage. But the Lithuanian Court of Appeal made only minor corrections to the sentence and did not reduce the sentence or the amount of damages.
The crime was committed in 2019. September 28, at approximately 6:20 pm, in the garage. According to the data in the case, V. Anuprevičius arrived there to continue the conflict with S. Ž.
Sitting in the Audi A6 Avant, he once fired an illegal self-propelled rifle at S. Ž through the driver’s side window glass.
The man was hit in the neck area. He suffered a neck injury with large-scale destruction of the airways and major cervical blood vessels.
This caused acute cerebral circulatory and respiratory failure, of which the victim died at the scene.
Guilt was only partially admitted
V. Anuprevičius fully admitted the guilt of disposing of arms and ammunition. He had bought a revolver in a store 20 years ago, it was allowed, he had weapons documents.
Shoot a paid man. Said he shot the mad dog. Bought a self-made double-barreled rifle from a friend many years ago.
With respect to S. Ž. the killer only partially pleaded guilty. He said he didn’t want to shoot anything and fired inadvertently.
He explained that in 2019. September 28 Called a neighbor who he had been friends with and had a close relationship with for 5-7 years, he wanted to meet up. At first she refused, but then she called, calling herself.
He went to his apartment around 8.30 am, took him 0.5 liters. vodka. She was an amateur drinker, unfaithful to her husband. He drank some vodka, between 100 and 150 grams, as he planned to go to town in the evening.
He left around 11 o’clock. V. Anuprevičius called her neighbor again around 5 in the afternoon, but it was not her, but a man who answered. Angry, he said: “Goat, will you hang up or not?”
The neighbor then picked up the phone and asked what he wanted. He felt the woman intoxicated, began to blow her with other men. Those men supposedly invited him to come. V. Anuprevičius did not dare to go to the apartment. They agreed to meet in the garages.
The killer said he took the gun because he was afraid of the threat and wanted to show he had a gun so as not to sneak up on him. When a man approached his car, V. Anuprevičius fired. The killer then still grabbed the body to get out of the garage area.
The killer returned home. Police officers soon approached him. He assured her that he was sober at the time of the shooting, and after all he got drunk after returning.
Denied intimate relationships
The woman who testified in court said that the defendant V. Anuprevičius is her neighbor, they were connected by friendly and neighborly relations, they were relatives for about 6-7 years, when she moved to the nearby apartment.
The woman said she had not seen weapons with him. It is true that V. Anuprevičius said that he had a weapon, said that there was a conflict with another woman and said that she would not die from his death.
Although V. Anuprevičius claimed that they were connected by an intimate relationship, the woman in court said that this was not true. V. Anuprevičius allegedly called her and wrote her messages, although she asked not to because the woman’s wife was a bit jealous.
The murdered S. Ž. the woman did not know. It just happened that that day he met an acquaintance who invited him to celebrate his friend’s birthday. S. Ž., Who was later a murder victim, was also in the company.
[ad_2]
