[ad_1]
LLRA-KŠS requests the Seimas and the President to address the Constitutional Court for serious violations during the Seimas elections.
“We filed our complaint yesterday,” MEP Valdemar Tomaševski, president of LLRA-KŠS, told BNS on Sunday.
The party asks the CC to clarify whether the “Todo Bien, Voldemortai” campaign carried out by the presenter Andrius Tapinas and the public institution Laisvės TV to prevent LLRA-KŠS from entering parliament did not violate the funding of political norms and the political turmoil. order.
Tapin claimed that he had opened a special account for this campaign and raised about 15,000. euros.
“It is not yet clear who donated that money. (…) It cannot be the case that the parties follow the rules and others raise money and do not indicate the sources. Maybe foreign money here, maybe some money from criminal activities ? ”- V.Tomaševskis told BNS.
The party also asks whether the law prohibiting the publication of material that compromises candidates five days or less before the elections has been violated.
According to V.Tomaševskis, a video clip directed against LLRA-KŠS and its candidates was shown on the Internet. According to the politician, the CEC did not even evaluate this clip.
The party also asks to be interested in the first round of the Seimas elections in the Paneriai-Grigiškės single-member constituency. According to her, there have been numerous violations of the electoral campaign and counting rules, which is why she questions whether democratic electoral procedures have been violated.
“Did the serious violations of the Seimas Elections Law in this single-member constituency allow the Central Election Commission to accurately identify the candidates who entered the second round of the Seimas elections,” asks LLRA-KŠS.
According to her, in a large-scale campaign, A. Tapinas called for action against the LLRA-KŠS in the Seimas elections: an anti-advertising video was distributed, a special edition newspaper “Viso gero was thrown into the mailboxes of the population , Valdemarai “, with a circulation of 300 thousand. copy, created a defamatory profile on social media.
Arno Strumilos / 15min nuotr./Andrius tapinas
“A. Tapinas organized discouragedly to vote for LLRA-KŠS so that only the latter would not enter the Seimas,” the party says.
According to V. Tomaševskis, serious violations of the Seimas electoral procedure were committed and could have had a significant impact on the results.
Seimas Justas deputy Džiugelis wrote another speech to the president about the Seimas elections. He complains of violations committed in the single-member district of Nemenčinė.
“According to current legislation, within 24 hours. I decided to ask the president to ask the Constitutional Court to clarify whether the rights of citizens were not violated when a large number of residents of Nemenčinė County were not allowed to vote for the candidate from their place of residence, “said the politician who he had performed in that district.
“I want to emphasize that this is not a fight for a mandate, as you know, I entered the Seimas in a multi-member parliament. This is a fight for a fair policy and the constitutional rights of citizens,” emphasized J. Džiugelis.
The CEC approved the final results of the Seimas elections on Saturday. He admitted that the “Todo bien, Voldemortai” campaign and the publication “Todo bien, Valdemarai” were negative LLRA-KŠS advertisements, but did not violate the electoral campaign law, because neither A. Tapinas nor “Laisvės TV” participated in the campaign. politics.
The Seimas Elections Law provides that decisions of the Central Election Commission or its refusal to examine complaints regarding violations of the Seimas Elections Law may be appealed to the Seimas or the President no later than 24 hours after they are announced. officially the final results of the elections.
In such cases, within 48 hours of receiving the complaint, appeals to the Constitutional Court for violations of the Seimas Elections Law. This assesses whether violations have been committed. If it is established that the infractions were serious and had a significant impact on the electoral results, the Seimas will make the decision on the cancellation of the results or the determination of the actual final results.
[ad_2]
