[ad_1]
How 15 minutes Lina Andriuškevičienė said, the decision on how the brothers will behave after the uproar will become clear next week. However, according to the lawyer, there is a very high probability that this time it will have to be interpreted in court.
“Currently we are waiting for reactions in the public sphere, because we want to obtain a clear answer as to why moral is confused with law. It cannot be the other way around, in this case we consider that the opinion expressed has nothing to do with the activity. We take it seriously because, although there is no serious crime, the sentence has been served, they expect to be full members of society ”. 15 minutes said the lawyer.
“They hope to be full members of society”, 15 minutes said the brothers’ lawyer.
After emphasizing several times that morality is confused with the law in a noisy situation, L. Andriuškevičienė emphasized that the position of Krzysztof and Darjus Lavrinovičius does not need to formalize the situation with a monetary relationship, only justice is sought.
“We want justice, because for some reason it is not possible for them to live normally, enjoy themselves, earn money by advertising something. We are not against the problem, but in this case the brothers who walk down the street cannot be personalized with the object of the great suffering of women. This cannot be done categorically, ”he said. 15 minutes His opinion was based on an attorney representing the interests of the brothers.
Photo by Julius Kalinskas / 15min / Lina Andriuškevičienė
On Friday, L. Andriuškevičienė’s public address was also distributed:
“Today, in the public space, we learned the position of Jurgis Didžiulis that the execution of a sentence 16 years ago basically means nothing, because” for a certain segment, for a certain part of the people, it can be painful. “According to J. Didžiulis, now it’s the opposite, the achievements we have made send a signal that “nobody cares about this and nobody takes violence against women seriously”.
The question is: who doesn’t care? We care, we are sorry, we have served our sentence. In accordance with all the laws of the Republic of Lithuania. And we follow them. The law says that we have redeemed the guilt against society. But almost 20 years later, this situation intensifies again and again, and now it is presented to us as a reminder of the suffering of all women who have experienced violence. Therefore, in accordance with the applicable legal norms, we have the right to demand that we are not called “convicted rapists” and that we are no longer associated with the crime, because, as mentioned, it is imperative in the law: we have served our sentence and we have the right to a full public life.
The brothers who walk down the street cannot be personalized with the object of the great suffering of women
Our bio basically conveys the message that negative action comes with unavoidable responsibility. We recognized this responsibility and we served our sentence. Therefore, the goal now is to form a public opinion that we are not worthy of the status of full members of society, that we have to limit our public cultural, economic, social activities, which fundamentally violates rights, honor and the dignity not only of us but also of our families.
Active public figures, when they post stigmatizing records about us in order to remind the public of our “criminal past” and thus limit our ability to fully participate in public life, underestimate the fact that their own actions are in line with the Code. Criminal: “Person who has carried out actions aimed at preventing a group of people or a person belonging to him from participating in economic, social, cultural or other activities on an equal basis with others due to his social condition.
Personal Album Photo Album / Brothers Lavrinovičiai, Aleksandras Pogrebnojus, Indrė Kavaliauskaitė
15 minutes Remember that for a few days the singer Jurgis Didžiulis shared a frame on social networks in which he showed the ingenious Telia Lietuva commercial not with two Lavrinovich brothers, as usual, but even with three. But the text that accompanies the photo is not about that.
The artist was outraged by the company’s decision to use the faces of Darjus and Kšštof Lavrinovičius, who had run into trouble with law enforcement in the past, for their new proposals. As a result, Erica Jennings decided to leave Telia.
15min and photo from personal album / Jurgis Didžiulis, Lavrinovičiai
In addition, the statement on the Internet received not only a message of support, but also messages of outrage. This led Telia to abandon Ežio’s advertising with Kšištof and Darjus Lavrinovich. Therefore, such a decision and public discrimination led the brothers to consult with lawyers about further actions.
Therefore, in response to the confusion on the Internet, J. Didžiulis posted a video on Facebook explaining the purpose of the actions of him and his wife Erica. Video you will see HERE.
[ad_2]
