[ad_1]
R.Vaičekauskaitė agreed to share his thoughts expressed on social media with 15 minutes readers:
“Has public discrimination against the Lavrinovich brothers just happened?
What would be the position of the Prosecutor’s Office and the Office of the Ombudsman for Equal Opportunities against the Giants?
The stigma of justice: a life sentence for society? From a legal standpoint, I silently looked at the core of the Lavrinovich brothers’ story about Ežio’s ad campaign, and you know, inside, I still believed that Telia could withstand the pressure and defend her choice. However, the “spine” was not shown. What a pity…
Even members of the Seimas and those who can run for the Seimas at the end of their sentences, people go to work and the employer has no right not to accept a person just because they have been sentenced, so why don’t the brothers can they represent trademarks in advertising? Because only 2 singers decided it? Is it really the voice of the public? Or maybe only a few people have an absolutely immature public teaching of thoughts?
When a sentence disappears or is lifted, a person is considered illegal, but society forgets it. The trial is not a lifetime record. Furthermore, after the expiration or revocation of the sentence period, the person is considered never to have been sentenced.
If the Telia representatives had contacted me, what would I have advised them? He unequivocally sued Didžiuliai for the destruction of the reputation of his brands (Telia, Ežys, etc.). Perhaps it would have been enough to conduct a public opinion poll and confirm that it is already clear that Lavrinovich definitely has the trust and sympathy of the public.
“Therefore, we have decided to suspend the current Hedgehog campaign and continue to unconditionally support the values and initiatives of freedom of expression, women’s rights, equality, diversity and non-discrimination,” Telia said in a statement. Ladies and gentlemen, what are you talking about? Such a public statement is nothing more than the humiliation of the Lavrinovičius basketball players, a clear sign of stigma and not otherwise! And yet here, in my opinion, you have discriminated at the highest possible level!
Has Telia declared that it unconditionally adheres to the rule of law? This means that we are still a long way from the rule of law here …
And judging by this situation, I am already changing position. Maybe it’s time for the brothers to go to court? In my opinion, his reputation has clearly been damaged (or perhaps orders have been lost or will definitely be lost) and I already see several people as defendants in this case.
I will not be lazy and write a request to the Office of the Equal Opportunity Ombudsman!
And the prosecution seems to have activities here too! Imprisonment of up to 3 years for this “show” can help to understand what a conviction is, what happens when it disappears, and how to continue living and putting your thoughts out in public to (and even systematically) prevent people from participating on an equal footing. with the rest. work or other activities “.
READ ALSO:
A. Pogrebnojus, who was on the side of Lavrinovičius, passed J. Didžiulis: “And what did you do for Lithuania?”
After the uproar, Telia decided to stop advertising Ežio with his Lavrinovich brothers
[ad_2]
