[ad_1]
The Prime Minister’s adviser, Tomas Beržinskas, stated on Thursday that the COEC “announced that the Prime Minister had no influence on the financing of road paving in the Vilnius district and that S. Skvernelis did not confuse public and private interests” .
In fact, the COEC did not publish either.
The Commission acknowledged that it had received no substantive factual evidence that the Prime Minister had confused public and private interests in making financing decisions for the paving of his residential street.
In making a decision, the COEC could choose between 7 variants of the result of the investigation provided for in the COEC Law, including the recognition that S. Skvernelis did not violate the provisions of the Law on Coordination of Public and Private Interests, but the commission it did not.
Instead, the investigation ended, which is required by law if there is insufficient data, necessary for the legal evaluation of the conduct of a person.
In other words, the commission left Skvernel without an evaluation.
In other words, the commission left S. Skvernelis without evaluation, and S. Skvernelis himself was left hanging along with unanswered questions, which journalists and opponents who were not born yesterday had already tried to ask him about the street many times.
At a press conference on Thursday, S. Skvernelis thanked those who supported him, mentioned the conservatives who were insidiously harmed, complained that the family had experienced psychological violence and that he himself had been slandered and had been the victim of lies.
The prime minister’s triumph in a completely unsolved situation seemed small, to say the least. Of course, this was not for a sympathetic or analytical audience.
The COEC did not rule out Thursday that it could update the investigation as new data becomes available. But that is unlikely to happen.
Some time ago, the COEC had fun slapping ministers who had forgotten their duties. But faced with a multi-layered story involving one of the state’s most important people, the COEC blew for half a year until it declared that the draft resolution voted by the Prime Minister did not include Upės Street. Although this has repeatedly highlighted this story by the brave 15 minutes.
On Thursday, the COEC recognized that it was not competent to comment on economic, social decisions, etc. taken on the subject of street paving in the Vilnius district municipality. validity. Although how this issue paved the way not only in the municipality but also in the Ministry of Transport, and was the key that could unlock the mysteries of being.
Obviously, the Commission was not competent to explain why the Vilnius district was not charged an additional 10% last year according to the national minority line, as provided by the same legal act prepared by S. Skvernelis while he was still the Minister of the Interior, but 17%.
As can be seen from the issues discussed at the COEC meeting on Thursday, all the commission could do was ask S. Skvernelis and Jaroslav Narkevičius if they would debate to whom the 300,000 would be allocated and would hear a negative response. Or hope that if there was such a conversation, someone recorded it and will definitely send it to the commission.
The COEC was unable, and perhaps due to the peculiarities of the law regulating its activities, to assess the whole, so this story, unfortunately, was not attached.
But how is the public seeing it now?
Perhaps you have to drink and finally believe that the Prime Minister, who drove home from work and back, never saw that asphalt was being laid on the street where he lived?
Is it normal for streets to be paved at the request of the Department of Defense Security, which brings in heads of state?
Or perhaps you just believe in the words of T. Beržinskas that the COEC announced that S.Skvernelis did not confuse public and private interests?
[ad_2]
