[ad_1]
Attorney Dalius Gintautas, who is being swept up in various criminal cases, appears to have no intention of stopping. They threaten him with new suspicions.
The deception has been discovered
This time, for a crime that could have been committed in the courtroom. However, not in defense of any accused, but in his own case, in which he is accused of illegal translation for economic, commercial, financial or professional activities, falsification of documents and negligent accounting.
According to the lawyers who consulted the newspaper, the behavior of D. Gintautas in the case of this case held two weeks ago, about which he also wrote “Kauno diena”, is a classic example of how to hinder the judge’s activities.
As already written, this hearing was postponed after defendant D. Gintautas stated that his new defense attorney, with whom he had concluded a contract only the day before, was unable to familiarize himself with the case. For this reason, a break was announced on her exam.
However, ten days later, the Kaunas District Court received a report from Laima Jašmontienė, one of Klaipeda’s legal assistants. The content of this is quite emotional, and the essence is shocking.
According to L. Jašmontienė, she has not concluded any agreement with D.Gintautas in this case. And the reasons are confidential.
Judging by the content of the emotional message, it can be concluded that D. Gintautas has publicly pretended. And not once. He first testified about his new lawyer after hearing that the judge hearing the case, Tatjana Butkienė, had rejected his request that the court withdraw. Only then did he say that the woman he had brought to order was the new attorney he had contracted with for some time. However, his defender did not bring this contract today. After that, D. Gintautas began to say that this contract is on his computer. And only when the judges declared that she would not connect the computer to the case, they requested a break from the trial because her lawyer did not have access to the case file overnight.
I didn’t want to communicate
“Kauno diena” asked L.Jašmontienė why he wrote the statement to the court, although D.Gintautas was brought to the hearing. It is true that one of his replicas of D. Gintautas’s speech surprised all the participants of the meeting. L.Jašmontienė stated that his client’s statement is “unconscious”. However, he was not willing to go into more detail.
L. Jašmontienė was reluctant to communicate with the media. After asking about the circumstances in which he was in the hearing of D. Gintautas’s case, if he did not represent her, L. Jašmontienė reiterated that this trial was public. Finally, he clarified that he had arrived in Kaunas at that time, since he had represented D. Gintautas in another case that was to take place in a nearby building. As already written, D. Gintautas had also mentioned this, asking for a rest in his judgment. A meeting scheduled for a month ago is scheduled for his children, who are the most important to him in life.
L. Jašmontienė was unwilling to answer the question as to why she did not immediately report the fact that D. Gintautas lied to the court. L. Kašmontienė has already stated to Kauno Diena that at that time the draft agreement was still being coordinated, because the court was expected to withdraw. And he did not sign this agreement with D. Gintautas for confidential reasons.
The statute of limitations for the accused crimes of D. Gintautas is eight years. And these, according to the prosecution, can be done from November 2013 to 2015.
One of the reasons that D. Gintautas is looking for ways to stop the trial of his case, which is already coming to an end, is the planned interview with his wife, who wants to divorce him. She was ready for that even when D. Gintautas, judging by L. Jašmontienė’s report to the court, pretended to be. Incidentally, the latter sent a copy of said report to Mr. Gintautas himself.
D. Gintautas’s lie was exposed by an assistant lawyer who had previously assisted him.
More than 100 sheets
As already written, the prosecution in the D. Gintautas case, which has been pending in the Kaunas District Court for several years, covers 108 pages.
The case was transferred to the Kaunas District Court in December 2017. And the pre-trial investigation began in 2015, after officers from the Kaunas County Chief Police Commissioner Highway Police Board were detained to Inspect the vehicle, whose driver presented a document that surprised them. This was issued by the Do-It-Yourself Vehicle Manufacturers Association, headed by D. Gintautas.
During the pre-trial investigation, it became clear that the head of the association may have exploited the flaws in the law by changing the registration procedure for some vehicles.
Almost a racket
The association led by D. Gintautas registered custom-made vehicles and ATVs without a permit issued by the Ministry of Transport and Communications. And he took the money for it.
First, those who got hooked on advertising such services had to join the association and pay a membership fee. They were then issued vehicle numbers and registration and technical inspection certificates on behalf of the association. These documents are said to be valid for a couple of years, i. as long as those who acquire them can participate in public traffic.
A driver caught with traffic police officers with such a “document” was administratively sanctioned. Although, like other witnesses who testified in court, D. Gintautas had already paid it to the association headed by the accused.
In May 2018, D. Gintautas managed to get the court to return his case to the prosecutor, to clarify the accusation. In doing so, the case was referred to the courts in February 2019. However, after taking a break from his examination, D. Gintautas was able to become a lawyer. Although he had become an assistant attorney just six months ago before the case was first referred to court. No reaction was received from pre-trial investigative officers after reporting to the Bar Council.
Among the victims, and the son?
Not long ago, D. Gintautas became a suspect in another case: violence against his young son. You have an obligation not to contact or seek contact with the victim.
This suspicion was brought to the lawyer D. Gintautas after the interrogation of his six-year-old son with a judge before the trial. And the aforementioned obligation is when the mother of the victim has submitted a request to law enforcement agencies in an attempt to protect the child from the persecution of the father who tries to influence him due to the pre-trial investigation initiated.
According to Kauno Diena, the events in the new case of D. Gintautas took place on Christmas Eve last year. According to his wife, the father was violent six years ago intoxicated. After the incident, she claims to have left the house with the victim and an even younger daughter “as is.” And I rented an apartment with children. And their father not only has not contributed to the maintenance of the children for several months, but has also replaced the locks on the doors of his apartment, where they left him alone.
According to Kauno Dienas, the lawyer D. Gintautas was informed of the suspected violence against his young son and the Bar Association. However, pretrial investigation officers only received a response that their report had been received.
OPEN GALLERY
->
Photo by Laimis Steponavičius.
