[ad_1]
As i wrote before 15 minutes, M.Šalčiūtė was held administratively responsible because it did not submit data on individual activities to the State Tax Inspectorate from 2017 to 2019 and did not comply with the instructions to submit them.
The first court hearing was to take place remotely via the Zoom platform on March 2, but M. Šalčiūtė did not appear there, therefore the hearing of the case was postponed. The court summons was sent to the girl by email, but when she did not respond, the question arose as to whether M. Šalčiūtė was informed about the place, time and date of the court hearing.
Photo by Sigismund Gedvila / 15min / Monika Šalčiūtė
However, he did not join the meeting scheduled for March 29. Finally, at the last second, the judge received an email from Monika Šalčiūtė, in which she presented her version of events.
In the letter, the social media star reported on the situation after hearing from the press and not even realizing he was in trouble. He also asked not to hold a court hearing during the Zoom conference, but case judge Viktorija Šelmatė emphasized that currently, although the quarantine is still extended in Lithuania, live hearings are held only in exceptional cases. Therefore, this request from M.Šalčiūtė was rejected.
Therefore, the next hearing was scheduled for April 12, but the judge postponed it until May 11 due to objective circumstances (not at the initiative of the parties).
But how 15 minutes Gintarė Vosyliūtė, Advisor to the President of the Vilnius City District Court, informed M.Šalčiūtė, who had to join the remote hearing on the morning of May 11 and did not appear again. So without seeing other solutions, a delivery was named.
“A representative from the STI joined the meeting. The court decided on the merits of the case and decided to take Monika Šalčiūtė to the next hearing. ” 15 minutes a court spokesman commented.
Since it has been decided to apply a reminder, it is possible that the meeting scheduled for June 1 will be held live. “You should still bring her physically. We will see how it will be, because sometimes in the end they agree to join, ”said G. Vosyliūtė.
He added that the court was still having difficulties in contacting M. Šalčiūtė; He did not answer the phone, so he was informed of the hearing by email.
A celebrity case of a social network was submitted pursuant to Article 505 of the ANC of the Republic of Lithuania. 1 d. These include the obstruction of the officials authorized by law to exercise the rights established by the laws that regulate their activities or for the performance of the functions assigned to them, the non-execution or improper execution of the instructions and legal requirements of these. officials, as well as the decisions (opinions) of state officials or collegiate institutions.
According to the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Republic of Lithuania, these minor offenses are subject to a fine of 80 to 780 euros.
With the actor of social networks 15 minutesLike the court, the contact has also recently failed.
[ad_2]
