[ad_1]
Everything is not so good anymore
Here the Minister of Social Security and Labor, now – the representative of the Democratic Group “In the name of Lithuania” Linas Kukuraitis has already said that not everything is so good.
According to the proposal, the average old-age pension will increase by 14 euros faster than the law provides. I’m not saying it’s an insignificant amount, I’m just asking if such an increase makes it worth promising a bright future and still changing the entire pension calculation system, especially in such a way that it has long-term negative consequences for credibility. of the whole system?
Although this increase in the pensions of the rulers is presented as a great advance in improving the lives of the elderly, this growth is much slower than during the previous legislature, ”the politician shared.
Seimas member L. Kukuraitis highlighted the positives before beginning to name the errors of the pension system.
“The good thing is that it aims to increase pensions faster than the law establishes. Poverty is also being addressed, at least for those with little work experience, between the ages of 15 and 30. And that’s good because their poverty rate is high. The very small pension bonus system has been tested so far and is still being resolved, ”L. Kukuraitis said on the program.
On the news radio show, he named who was promised to increase his pensions according to the plan presented.
“According to the proposal, the pension is mainly for those who have a short period of service; it can increase from 75 percent to 130 percent in three years. And for those who have the largest pensions, from 600 to 700 euros. AND for them, pensions would grow 28 percent in three years, and for those who have a minimum income but a long service, their pension growth will be 23 percent in three years, “said former Minister L. Kukuraitis.
The politician assured that this would lead to “certain inequalities” in the pension system.
“I would like to promote this at least, with a limited amount of money,” said the MP on the Open Talk program.
What do you need to change?
The Deputy Minister of Social Security and Labor, Audrius Bitinas, recalled in the program that the pension consists of two parts.
“In my opinion, the fact that there is an individual pension is distributed, is fine. For each one according to how much he paid. But the biggest problem with us is that the pension system is collapsing. Someone is affected by seniority somewhere, somewhere by contributions. We have calculated what part of the total part of the pension is financed by the state and is influenced by the time of service, and what percentage of the income is the individual part, which is purely the amount paid by the person ”, the interlocutor. told the radio news program “Open Talk”.
“It turns out that I was surprised myself that the total came to 60 percent. No matter how much you study in the system, it will not have such a significant impact. This must be changed, ”Vice Minister A. Bitin said on the show.
“We should go faster”
Vilnius University (VU) prof. Roma Lazutka said she criticized the government’s plans because they weren’t brave enough.
“But we are moving in that direction, I basically support them,” taught R. Lazutka, a lecturer at VU, in his position.
In his opinion, the government should approach the national pension, to pay the general part of the pension from the state budget to all those who have reached old age.
“Because now those who are supposed to be disabled since childhood are staying, they have never worked and have not been able to work. They are in old age and receive a welfare pension, which is even poorer. It is known that it has to go faster. The main topic in the discussions is the length of service, “said R. Lazutka.
According to the economist, the application of seniority to the entire country is incorrect if it is thought to reflect human merit.
“It’s like the one who worked the longest, as if he deserved more and should receive more. But no way, “he said.
Lazutka said that all people, regardless of their seniority, should receive a fixed pension.
[ad_2]
