[ad_1]
And although these appeals from the head of state are more general in nature, given the particularities of the political process of recent years, one wants to question whether the president really spoke in the abstract in his speech without seeking to criticize any particular political force just before the elections.
Nausėda’s emphasis on the development of ‘past hoaxes’ or ‘conspiracy theories’, from the point of view of political scientists, can be viewed in several ways:
Rima Urbonaitė, a professor at the Mykolas Romeris University (MRU), does not rule out the possibility that the head of state deliberately wanted to criticize the ruling “peasants” and their leaders, who devoted considerable time to the work of the opponents more than one year ago. decade. Meanwhile, Professor Lauras Bielinis from Vytautas Magnus University (Vytautas Magnus University) says that before the elections, the president just wanted to highlight a more general problem of the Lithuanian political reality: opposition from parties and society.
“Recently, in political discourse, conversations from the past have been associated mainly with the so-called commission of inquiry.
This was the leitmotif of this ruling majority, and especially of the “peasants.” They loved to stir up the past, they loved it, commenting on one topic or another, always paying attention to what and how the previous authorities were doing. It’s hard to say if the president had that in mind. On the other hand, knowing what was most talked about, the president was really able to point out that some of the actions that accompanied the current government’s policy were not very constructive, “R. Urbonaitė told Eltai.
According to the MRU political scientist, the president’s call to vote in the Seimas elections emphasized the thesis that the conspiracy theories no longer needed to be developed and could also have been directed at some of the ruling leader’s statements. According to R. Urbonaitė, taking into account the discourse of the political debates in recent weeks, some of the theses expressed by the head of state may have been influenced by the constantly repeated theory of R. Karbauskis that the Social Democrats have already agreed with Conservatives form a ruling majority after the elections.
Ramūnas Karbauskis says very clearly that there is such a conversation, he says that he will even have evidence, although he has never presented it. So the conspiracy theory is that if you vote for the Social Democrats and you get the Conservatives and Ingrid Šimonytė, we really have to. But, again, it’s unclear if that’s exactly what the president has in mind. We can only interpret, taking into account current contexts ”, said R. Urbonaitė.
Meanwhile, Professor L. Bielinis from Vytautas Magnus University evaluated the attractiveness of the president for Lithuanian society in the broader perspective of the conflicts prevailing in the political arena. According to him, G. Nausėda hardly applies to the actions of a particular party or its leaders. Rather, the professor explained, the president sought to draw attention to the damage done to society by the political opposition in general.
“I saw for the first time the president’s concern for public opposition. Elections are elections in which competing politicians can say a lot about each other. But then often one bends the stick and gets into a sharp confrontation. , accusing each other of going back to socialism, trying to turn Lithuania into Belarus and other similar things. “Very strong opposition is not healthy, even if it takes place during elections,” L. Bielinis told Eltai.
According to him, the president’s insinuations about unnecessary revolts in the past and the call to avoid conspiracy theories must be seen in a broader context, in which not only the confrontation of the largest Lithuanian parties.
“Let’s say you talk about the Lithuanian Polish election campaign, especially the right ones, as a pro-Soviet and pro-Soviet political force. But they forget that it is our living citizens who have an opinion and a position that simply does not coincide with the prevailing one. But still thus, it is our citizens who do not go beyond any law. Therefore, it is not necessary to discard or discard them just because they have that opinion. But in the heat of an election, those attitudes can be formed. In my head, the president he is more concerned about this, “said the political scientist, adding that even if G. Nausėda wanted a different majority than the current ruling majority after the Seimas elections, he does not show it publicly.
“I think the president wants something, his head, more positive, the way he understands it. On the other hand, I think he is sober enough and rationally realizes that the peasants are green and he will probably be one of the decisive partners of the coalition and therefore he, as president, must treat everyone equally ”, he summarized L. Bielinis.
On Thursday, the President addressed the people of the country, urging them to mobilize before the Seimas elections to be held on Sunday and express their civic will. The president also said that parliamentarians should represent the entire population, “not individual interest groups.” He urged residents to vote actively and responsibly.
“We cannot constantly delve into the past, search for suspected enemies, create conspiracy theories. We have a unique opportunity to use our capabilities and the power of the European Union to take a big step forward,” said G. Nausėda.
No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of ELTA.
[ad_2]
