[ad_1]
The last men to see the girl are producer Ričardas Pinikas and surgeon Aivaras Miltenis. However, this time A. Miltenis was open: the man says that many interesting things will become clear in the case under review, including on drugs, reports LNK News.
“There are some very interesting facts in the case that I won’t really reveal to you. However, they will definitely be clarified in the course of the case, from what you will see, – A. Miltenis told LNK. “As Černiauskas created intrigue, we will have our chance.”
Miltenis says he wants a faster hearing of the case.
“It just came to our attention then. Why delay that case? Asked A. Miltenis.” We want it faster. “
The defendants were outraged by the girl’s loved one’s lawyer, who asked to leave the judge because she questioned whether he was partial.
“The court has repeatedly stated that the case will be examined only within the limits of the prosecution. Meanwhile, we know that in some cases, the new circumstances become clear during the criminal process, so the court must be active, to establish an objective truth, “said Gintaras Černiauskas, the victims’ attorney.
However, the judge did not resign. Nor does he promise to appear before the Constitutional Court to find out if the judge himself can decide his fate upon hearing the case.
“I think the critic of his actions and decisions is poor enough. The arguments for exclusion must be evaluated by another judge,” said lawyer G. Černiauskas.
The passion is also fueled by a witness who noticed that the girl fell from the hotel balcony and then allegedly saw the accused run towards her.
“Certain circumstances suggest that the goal was to collect evidence from the crime scene and remove it, which alleviates our situation.” But I think such circumstances are very important, “said the victims’ attorney.
The court agreed to question a witness only when prosecutors made that request. The witness has already recalled what he saw in the pre-trial investigation, but the charges are now limited to drugs, causing physical pain and rape. Allegations of human trafficking and suicide or homicide were investigated after the investigation.
“Since these allegations are no longer being made, this witness was no longer questioned. After that, he was asked to be questioned and the court granted the prosecutor’s request,” said H. Mackevičius, Miltenis’ lawyer.
Experts, a psychiatrist and a psychologist, were also interviewed, reports LNK.
The case, which came to court in winter, had remained unopened for a long time: The girl’s family lawyer, Gintautas Černiauskas, wanted the case to be returned to the prosecutor’s office and for the men to receive more severe charges. , but all complaints were rejected. Both defendants were reluctant to communicate with the media. Mr. Pinikas arrived a few minutes before the meeting.
On June 17, the court finally opened a case in which defendants R. Pinikas and A. Miltenis denied the crimes against him; and G. Černiauskas, the girl’s family lawyer, argued that the men who had appeared in court should also be tried for human trafficking and murder. G. Černiauskas sought to return the case to prosecutors for completion. The lawyer’s complaints were rejected.
Prosecutor Diana Baltrūnaitė-Petkevičienė, who requested closed court hearings, stated at the preparatory hearing that various details of personal life were also mentioned during the examination of the reported crimes. The court granted the prosecutor’s request, although the lawyer for the relatives of D. Didžiūnaitytė objected: according to him, the girl’s family seeks transparency, wants the death of their daughter to be meaningless and everything that will be said in the court will serve other girls. G. Černiauskas ‘assistant, Vykintas Gutauskas, spoke about a mysterious witness who saw R. Pinikas’ actions immediately after the tragic event.
“We have asked the court to call more witnesses because the prosecutor has called five and 64 people have been interviewed. There are some very important witnesses who have seen Pinic’s actions on Deauville’s body. It was not a wish to make sure that she was still alive, he was trying to take certain items that could become important evidence in the case. This witness is not invited, but we will ask him to call him, “said the assistant attorney more than a month ago.
Then A. Miltenis’ lawyer, Henrikas Mackevičius, criticized the 200 thousand. An action for non-pecuniary damages. According to the lawyer, the action is based on the murder, and there are no such complaints in the case. Ms. Julia Monaco-Galminė, R. Piniko’s lawyer, was not willing to speak. She said there was no evidence of her defendant’s guilt in the case.
When asked how she believed the case came to court, the lawyer said that this question should not be asked to her but to the prosecutor.
Delfi recalls that on November 20, 2018. Police received a report that at 7 p.m. 35 min. A dead girl was found near the Amberton Klaipeda hotel.
A man who called the police said the girl had fallen from the 14th floor balcony.
According to the case, R. Pinikas reported his death. Initially, the investigation launched into suicide, but as the media became interested in the process, the disaster was investigated for possible murder or suicide.
Dovilė’s relatives were surprised to learn of the tragedy, as the girl came from Milan to Vilnius to participate in the presentation of the Juozas Statkevičius collection. A few days later, Deauville had to fly to Milan again. According to his friends, the girl who participated in the party after J. Statkevičius’s presentation was intoxicated, but none of them prevented the girl from traveling to Klaipeda. The girls said that R. Pinikas took Deauville.
The man put her up at the Amberton Klaipeda Hotel, where the tragedy took place. G. Černiauskas, a lawyer representing the Dovilė family, wanted at least one of the men to be tried for the murder, but the prosecutor’s office raised different suspicions in court. The lawyer attempted to cover the murder or suicide of a girl and human trafficking. However, complaints about the allegations made were rejected.
It is strictly prohibited to use the information published by DELFI on other websites, in traditional media or elsewhere, or to distribute our material in any way without consent, and if consent has been obtained, DELFI must be indicated as the source.
[ad_2]
