[ad_1]
Journalists discussed this on Monday on the “Žinių radijo” program “Events and comments”.
What did you say Delphi Commentator Vladimir Laučius, you can understand the reasons for the withdrawal of advisers from the Communication Group.
“This is the area where the president’s communication is most visible and heard, and the president himself may be inclined to place great importance on communication,” noted V. Laučius.
Jūratė Damulytė, Lithuanian news editor for the BNS news agency, spoke similarly.
“Perhaps the opinions of the team members and the president himself differed. Nobody speaks much to explain those reasons, but we can predict them. We have seen several situations in which that communication has provoked a great deal of criticism, it has become unbalanced. Some people may say they did not pay enough attention to advice, maybe that’s a pretext. I understand that it is difficult to be a counselor when there is not much need and little consideration for advice, “said J. Damulytė.
Consideration is being given to why A. Budrytė left
Speaking about the resignation of A. Budrytė as Chancellor of the Presidency, V. Laučius stated that the reasons for this step may be various.
“We must not forget that A. Budrytė was the head of the electoral staff of G. Naus personalda as a presidential candidate and, through her and some other people who have already resigned as presidential advisers, the financial affairs of the election campaign were handled .
Recall (…) those reports were discussed of a possible instructional specification. services to collect information about the environment of the presidential candidate G. Nausėda in 2019 and among those surnames – people on whom information could have been collected were A. Budrytė and the advisor A. Zabarauskas already resigned “, – he recalled Delphi critical.
According to him, A. Budrytė may not have wanted to testify on this matter.
“Perhaps the Chancellor has something to say on the matter and has proactively resigned in order not to have to testify on these issues, because in the absence of those duties, she can refuse to testify,” commented V. Laučius.
Gypsy Naus Gda, Antanas Bubnelis
At the time, J. Damulytė also said that A. Budrytė’s resignation raises questions.
“It is not very clear and there is no information whatsoever on why the person closest to the headquarters of the presidential elections of the former team, A. Budrytė, the chancellor withdrew and what are the reasons. It would be very interesting to meet them, but I am still very skeptical about it, ”said BNS’s Lithuanian news editor.
Is the presidency confused?
For his part, head of the magazine IQ. Editor Ovidijus Lukošius said on the program that President G. Nausėda does not find a place in Lithuanian politics.
“The president does not find his place in Lithuania under the tire, especially during the quarantine period.” The president cannot be the moral authority that many probably still expect, because he is a directly elected politician who generally has a high rating, “he noted. O. Lukošius.
According to him, confusion is also felt when it comes to the president’s relationship with those in power.
“Conservatives are feeling the power, because those eyes are on the side of the president, so every action has an impact,” said the head of IQ magazine. editor.
In his opinion, it was the presidency that first faced conflict with the Conservatives.
V. Laučius also commented that there has recently been a “push for power” in power, the initiator of which is not easy to name.
“The impression is that the president seemed to want the Seimas elections to end more or less as they ended, but at the same time, neither he nor his team had planned their future actions in national politics and communication strategy. That impression that the presidency is a little disturbed, “said V. Laučius.
[ad_2]
