[ad_1]
This is exactly what another well-known family caught, artists Eric Jennings and Jurgis Didžiulis, because according to them, the company is publicized by people on trial.
True, not only famous people, but also well-known lawyers sided with the brothers.
The latter shared her thoughts on what should have been done differently in this situation, and also made an offer to Lavrinovich, whose reputation, according to her, was seriously damaged.
The news portal tv3.lt contacted one of the brothers, Kšištofas Lavrinovičius admitted that he was considering a proposal to take the Didžiuliai family to court.
“We have not made up our minds about this yet, we are all convinced to take the Great One to court.” The lawyers want to prevent this story from ending forever and prevent it from happening again, “said the man.
The basketball player had a hard time collecting the words: “It is discrimination, I see how my family is going and how difficult it is for them. On the one hand, I don’t want their children to suffer so much because I know that if we go to court, the Giants can also be condemned. And children are not guilty, I do not want to see tears from them or my children. “
“Time has passed, the situation is improving, but we are still deciding whether to go to court. Everyone invites us, they support us, he has helped our family a lot, I am very grateful for that ”, Christoph thanked those who sincerely supported him.
We remember that in 2013, for exactly the same situation, Jurgis and Erica had left Bite, but after the scandal, the couple apologized to the Lavrinovich brothers: “They are deceiving the public, we became tough and did nothing. We thought people really understood their mistake, after all we were all wrong. However, this is repeated again and misleads the public, it is very unpleasant and painful, I do not understand its objectives.
We remind you that on Wednesday evening, the lawyer Rasa Vaičekauskytė shared her thoughts on the situation on the Facebook account of the social network: “Has the public discrimination against the Lavrinovičius brothers just been carried out? What would be the position of the Prosecutor’s Office and the Office of the Ombudsman for Equal Opportunities against the Giants? The stigma of justice: a life sentence for society?
From a legal standpoint, I silently watched the core of the Lavrinovich brothers’ story about the Hedgehog ad campaign and, you know, inside, I still believed that Telia could withstand the pressure and defend her choice. However, the “spine” was not shown. What a pity…
Even members of the Seimas, and those after conviction, can apply for the Seimas, people go to work and the employer has no right not to accept a person just because they have been sentenced, so why can’t the brothers represent trademarks in advertising in this case? Because only 2 singers decided it? Is it really the voice of the public? Or maybe only a few people have an absolutely immature public teaching of thoughts?
When a sentence disappears or is lifted, a person is considered illegal, but society forgets it. The trial is not a lifetime record. Furthermore, once the sentence period has expired or revoked, the person is considered never to have been sentenced.
If the Telia representatives had contacted me, what would I have advised them? Unequivocally for destroying the reputation of their brands (Telia, Ežys, etc.), who sued Didžiuliai. Perhaps it would have been enough to conduct a public opinion poll and confirm what is already clear: Lavrinovich definitely has the trust and sympathy of the public.
“Therefore, we have decided to suspend the current Hedgehog campaign and continue to unconditionally support the values and initiatives of freedom of expression, women’s rights, equality, diversity and non-discrimination,” Telia said in a statement.
Ladies and gentlemen, what are you talking about? Such a public statement is certainly nothing more than the humiliation of the Lavrinovich basketball players, a clear sign of stigma, and no other way! And yet here, in my opinion, you have discriminated at the highest possible level!
Has Telia declared that it unconditionally adheres to the rule of law? This is here, which means that we are still a long way from the rule of law …
And judging by this situation, I am already changing position. Maybe it’s time for the brothers to go to court? In my opinion, there has been obvious damage to their reputation (or maybe they have lost or will definitely lose orders) and I even see some people with the defendants in this case.
I will not be lazy and write a request to the Office of the Equal Opportunity Ombudsman!
And the prosecution seems to have activities here too! Imprisonment of up to 3 years for this “spectacle” could help to understand what a conviction is, what happens when it disappears and how to continue living and putting your thoughts in public to (and even seems to do so systematically) to prevent people with equal rights. others to participate in work or other activities, ”he wrote.
[ad_2]
