After a scandalous hunt in the Ukmergė district. – Police Court, Lawyer and Chief of Hunting: Unexpected defense



[ad_1]

As already announced 15 minutesThe hunt, in which a lawyer, a policeman and two hunters from the “Lėnas” club were arrested, already has the first legal assessment. One of the hunters Giedrius Aniūnas was found guilty of two rapes, fined, deprived of a special right (to hunt), and hunting equipment confiscated.

Today, three other detainees had to appear in court in Ukmergė. They are Laimonas Judickas, a lawyer at the Triniti Jurex law firm, and Edvardas Balčiūnas, a Ukmergė district police officer, and Aleksas Gečiauskas, a member of the Ukmergė Lėnas district hunting club. The latter was formally the hunting guide responsible for completing the documents.

The accused Vilnius lawyer categorically denied having participated in the hunt in court and reported an unexpected version of the incident: he had come to Ukmergė to rescue a hitherto unknown policeman who needed his services as a lawyer. While the hunt was taking place, those services were supposed to be provided – there was never a time to contribute to the hunt, because the officer was very concerned about his son’s future.

“It just came to our knowledge then. I came to Balčiūnas to help, to speak with him as a client, about legal issues,” said attorney L. Judickas, emphasizing that the motive and purpose of this event should be important to explain if they were committed. violations or not.

Understand instantly

  • Laimonas Judickas, an attorney with the Triniti Jurex law firm, on Jan.22. publicly confirmed that he was one of the four detainees, a lawyer told BNS.
  • “In the car, I think the deer was legally hunted. In my opinion, legally. As it turns out later, I don’t know. Until the investigation started, I had no other data and I think it will be confirmed. In 2021, I did not participate in the hunt and I did not hunt anything, ”said the lawyer in January.
  • Judick said he did not participate in the hunt, but simply “went to the guests”, because one of the hunters in the car is a friend he had known “for a quarter of a century.”
  • Attorney L. Judick, who is charged with a single violation in the case filed together with the hunting administrator and accompanying police officer (ANK Article 290 (7) – transport of an illegally hunted animal), suggested waiting for a judicial evaluation. of the situation. L. Judickas did not mention going to client E.Balčiūnas due to the mistakes of his last son at the time.

Both attorney L. Judickas and police officer E. Balčiūnas said in court today that they acknowledge the factual circumstances of the event, but deny their assessment. That is, by denying having participated in the hunt, they also remove responsibility for the crime of which they are accused: transporting the beast.

Protocols were drawn up for the four people in accordance with Article 290 of the ANC. 7 d. for transporting an illegally hunted beast: all are fined up to 1800 euros. At that time, a minimum fine of 800 euros had already been imposed on G.Aniūnas.

If the crimes are confirmed, the three people would face financial penalties. However, it is very important to Judick whether he will be associated with this hunt and punished or not. After all, one of the mandatory penalties in court for such violations is the confiscation of the vehicle. As is well known, the illegally hunted male deer was transported in the van of the lawyer from this capital.

Will be added

VIDEO: In Ukmergė, a lawyer, a policeman and a hunting officer appeared in court




[ad_2]